Tuesday, November 20, 2007

Oswald the Raven?

Frank Camper, in his 1997 book The Mk/Ultra Secret, alleged that Lee Oswald served as a trained sex-spy for the US Marine Corps while stationed at Atsugi Air Force Base (Japan) in the late-1950s. Camper offered as evidence numerous sightings of Oswald in local clubs, too expensive for him to afford, where he would meet the aging widows of wealthy Japanese industrialists and, literally, charm the pants off of them.

Camper also cites Oswald’s medical records for his time at Atsugi, noting in particular a diagnosis made by Capt. Paul Deranian, who in September 1958 determined that Lee had contracted “Urethritis, Acute, due to gonococcus #3033.”

In other words, Oswald had the clap. So what?

Well, sexual activity with unauthorized people was prohibited in the military. One could theoretically be court-martialed for the offense, especially if there’s evidence of hanky panky, such as coming down with VD.

Capt. Deranian also noted that the disease was “In line of duty, not due to own misconduct.” Question: how does anyone get the clap in the line of duty, other than serving as a sex spy?

In an article titled “Oswald & VD: An Intelligence Connection?” Mark Zaid explains that misconduct was determined by whether or not a soldier took himself out of action permanently on purpose or because of gross negligence, according to the Manual of the Judge Advocate General [US Navy]. Because Oswald reported his illness right away, he complied with Manual section 0809, which meant that he was acting in the line of duty.

That the USMC decided not to cite Oswald or any other Marines for misconduct, I can understand. The “In line of duty” explanation, however, is still curious. I mean, why would the Marines put something in a soldier’s file that seems like a commendation, rather than simply making a more neutral statement, or none at all? Thousands of servicemen contracted VD during the 1950s. I wonder if they have similar wording on their medical records.

Zaid’s essay doesn’t disprove the allegation that Oswald served as a sex spy. Zaid's saying that JFK researchers cannot use Oswald’s medical records to prove he was a sex spy. They have to use other evidence.

In recent years, someone has stepped forward out of the blue claiming to have been an integral part of Oswald’s life in the months preceding JFK’s assassination. Judyth Vary Baker, a biochemist specializing in cancer cell research, worked directly with Dr. Mary Sherman, an orthopedic surgeon, Director of Bone Pathology at the Ochsner Clinic in New Orleans, and an associate professor at Tulane Medical School.

In the British miniseries The Men Who Killed Kennedy, Baker relates the meet-cute with Oswald, who just happened to be nearby, and who also just happened to know David Ferrie, Dr. Alton Ochsner (the clinic’s founder), Dr. Sherman, and the research they had all been doing on how to artificially induce cancer into people.

Baker claims that she and Oswald had an affair, and that she very much fell in love with him, despite the fact that he was already married to Marina, and despite the fact that she was engaged to a man she would later marry.

Unfortunately, we don’t have the means to verify Baker’s story, or disprove it. But speculating that she is neither lying nor crazy, we would still have to wonder if Oswald was continuing to act in the capacity of a raven, given some of the rumors that had trailed him from Japan.

 

For more stuff on the JFK assassination, click here.

Labels: , ,

Links to this post

29 Comments:

  • At 5:10 AM, Blogger eric1313 said…

    Wow, I can't wait to pop this bit of trivia out to my conspiracy mongering friends. A sex spy? That puts a whole new spin on undercover work.

    I'm surprised someone hasn't tried to blame Oswald's actions on advanced Syphilis or something like that, in this case. But the case really can be made that our nation's military institution was a part of what twisted him into madman enough to become an assassin.

     
  • At 11:13 AM, Blogger Enemy of the Republic said…

    Oswald had the clap. More information that bears no weight on the shooting if he indeed did it, which I don't think he did.

    I will be a better reader. I've been so swamped. Please write me and tell me about your defense when you can.

     
  • At 12:53 PM, Blogger X. Dell said…

    Eric, the sex spy hypothesis was one that has been around for years. Basically, it represents another possibility concerning Oswald's connections to Intel. Jim Garrison didn't actually mention this, but he found far more compelling evidence that Oswald was a secret agent: the Russian language exam given to him by the Marines; his association with former ONI officer and FBI SAC Guy Bannister (they worked in the same building, and the relationship was corroborated by Bannister's assistant Jack Martin); Clay Shaw's involvement with Oswald's legal affairs (former DCI Richard Helms swore under oath that Shaw was a contract agent of the CIA); Col. Fletcher Prouty's discovery of an Oswald Intel file BEFORE the assassination; his relationship to CIA contract agent David Ferrie; and, perhaps the most compelling of all, since it's one of the few actual paper trails in the case, Garrison found correspondence back and forth between Oswald and the then-Secretary of the Navy.

    An overwhelming amount of forensic and witness evidence argues strongly against Oswald as one of the shooters; Officer Marion Baker's brief questioning of Oswald ninety seconds after the assassination on the second floor of the Texas School Book depository; the negative nitrate tests, which pretty much prove that he didn't fire any arms that day; the absence of fingerprints on the rifle he allegedly used (the rifle had been sent to the FBI lab for fingerprinting, but came back negative; a week later, however, someone on the Dallas police force found a partial palm print of Oswald's on the butt of the gun; palm prints aren't generally used in court because they're not nearly as distinguishing as fingerprints--furthermore, the match was only a five-point match, and most states require seventeen points for a positive ID, whereas Texas required only nine).

    That's just a small sample. I would recommend Garrison's book On the Trail of the Assassins for a whole lot more reasons for why Oswald couldn't have shot Kennedy.

    Enemy, the possibility that someone can get the clap "In line of duty" gives more weight to the idea that Oswald was a part of Intel, and not the angry lone nut that people make him out to be. With all due respect, I believe it does have a bearing on Kennedy's shooting, since Oswald was accused of the crime.

    I've finally got a defense date, so I will tell you about anon. Unfortunately, I'm swamped too.

     
  • At 1:56 PM, Blogger JohnB said…

    I had a relative who, during the early 70’s contracted pneumonia when he was drafted during the Vietnam era, so instead Uncle Sam sent him to Germany. When he finally recovered, he found himself in a rather strange job of tracking down prostitutes who allegedly gave servicemen any kind of VD. So, it struck me as a common sort of problem, as I would think it is today. I never thought to ask him if there was some sort of disciplinary action taken against the soldier who contracted this class of disease. You were in the military, weren’t you? You would know better…but it surprises me for some reason since knowing friends that have served, it just always seemed part of the territory.

     
  • At 3:02 PM, Blogger ..................... said…

    i never heard that he had the clap...
    in line of duty? hmmm.
    looking forward to more of this series..

     
  • At 4:45 PM, Blogger X. Dell said…

    John, when I first read Camper's book, about eight years ago, I started looking into the prevalence of VD in the troops during this time. Sure enough, it's been a persistent problem since WWII. The military has made a slew of documentary films about it (the really scary kind that they used to show us in school). There was also an investigation done shortly before Oswald entered into the service that revealed it to be a significant problem, hence the prohibition. But because of the commoness of the behavior, there's always been some tolerance for it. Officially, it's a court-martial offense. At the same time, it won't necessarily get you kicked out.

    I only served as a civilian in the USAF (GS-12), and really couldn't tell you much about official policy other than what's actually in the books. I do recall that at the time (mid-1980s) prostitutes were talked about openly, with members of all branches of the armed forces freely comparing specific sex workers, brothels, prices, services, you name it. The talk came from the ranks, from NCOs and commissioned officers. So I had to think that it was quite prevalent, but officially frowned upon.

    My ex-spy (?) friend told me that he was under very strict orders not to engage in sexual activity. He took the prohibitions quite seriously, it seems to me.

    It probably depends on your CO, your outfit, your detail, your billeting, et cetera, what you can or cannot get away with.

    Still, your uncle would be closer to that era. I wonder what he would say about the policy, in particular, how it would actually be worded in most instances.

    Talk to him much?

    Foam, if you know someone who might actually have a better perspective on this, I would be all ears to know what she or he has to say.

     
  • At 4:50 PM, Blogger foam said…

    nope, you are it. and i'm not disputing that he had the clap. just thought it was interesting.

     
  • At 5:01 PM, Blogger X. Dell said…

    Foam, I worded that poorly. Forgive me.

    I know Oswald contracted VD because it's noted in his service record. That's not the issue. What I was curious about, though, is the military's handling of it, in particular the actual notation used. I'm wondering if everyone who got the clap in the military receive similar wording on their medical transcripts, or if Oswald unique in this way.

     
  • At 9:50 PM, Blogger Enemy of the Republic said…

    Okay, I grant you that it has relevance on the case because Oswald was the intended fall guy. I phrased it poorly--there is so much evidence that indicates he wasn't the shooter--even the hush hush attitude of the Warren Commission just added to the web of disinformation. I don't have the details quite like you, but I have never read anything that convinced me that Oswald acted alone. I go out on a limb and say he didn't do it, but even if he had, he did not act alone. What I am not sure is who was behind it, but I don't believe it was Cuba or the Soviets. There is some data that makes the mob a candidate; they had much to gain from a Kennedy death. But I think it was some sector of government itself. I haven't worked out the why--how did Kennedy's death and the subsequent coverup aid this sector?

    I've read Jim Garrison's account as well. Fascinating book. The movie did not do it justice.

     
  • At 11:08 PM, Blogger JohnB said…

    Next time I see him, I'll ask. I will let you know of course...

     
  • At 12:26 AM, Blogger X. Dell said…

    Enemy, your's is a solid way to approach the subject. After eliminating Oswald as either a suspect or an accomplice, the question then becomes who else.

    Most prosecutors would look for motive, means and opportunity. In terms of motive, the Kennedy brothers pissed off a lot of people.

    Have you ever read (book), or seen (movie) Agatha Christie's Murder on the Orient Express?

    John, thanks. I would appreciate that. It's one thing to have been in the service. But to have a comment on this area from someone who actually worked with it would be a blessing.

     
  • At 1:53 AM, Blogger LADY LUXIE said…

    What a hard harsh life this poor Mr. Oswald had!

    I mean..."trained sex spy?"...

    Yeah' welp'..sex is great but to be to do it in order to spy..I mean...that's really....terrible...I wonder how much he was paid.

    And he got the...clap(?)...yikes!...

    I guess I just... I just feel honestly sorry for him. In my mind I'm seeing him as a person...human...real...without the intrigue and story...and am thinking what he could possibly be thinking about himself in his moments of being just alone.

     
  • At 4:07 AM, Blogger ..................... said…

    that would be interesting to find out. i've known tons of folks in the military. but if any of them had the clap and how that might be worded in their transcripts i don't know.
    maybe i'll just ask...?
    nahhhhhhhhh....;)

     
  • At 10:37 AM, Blogger X. Dell said…

    Lux, I'm not saying that Oswald is a sex spy. I'm merely posing the question that others have done before me. Like many things that conspiracy theorists wonder about, there are grounds to consider the question.

    He did come down with VD, though. That's in his medical records.

    Foam, I wasn't thinking that someone you knew might have come down with VD while in the service (although that would be a groove to know). I was wondering if any of them had served as a corpsman, a nurse, an attorney, or in any other capacity that could shed light on the veracity of Zaid's claims.

     
  • At 11:43 AM, Blogger Enemy of the Republic said…

    Well, I've always wondered about LBJ. He felt that JFK deserted Diem by allowing his killing in Vietnam. He also hated RFK with a vengeance and the ill-will was heartingly returned. A lot of people love RFK and I do admire the fact that he read the classics as comfort for his grief and carried them in his pocket, but he did a lot of JFK's dirty work, and he pissed off many of the old timers who were used to the wheeling and dealing of the 50s--Johnson among them. But I still find it hard to see LBJ behind the killing of a president, yet if he knew, I don't think he would have done much to stop it. Hoover is another possible culprit; he hated the Kennedys for their work in civil rights and he simply found them unAmerican--that's where Joseph Sr. comes into play. Joe was called "shanty Irish" so much that it could be on his tombstone; how many of the feds thought that Joe Sr. bought his son the presidency and would try to do it again with Robert, even though Joe was out of commission mentally after JFK died. So another motive is attacking the Kennedy clan in general. This is why the mob or feds are, to me at least, the probable culprits. Really, the Soviets couldn't have taken out a president, nor could have Castro.

    Some extreme theories don't even put Oswald at the scene of the crime. I believe Jack Ruby was paid big bucks to kill Oswald, either because he knew something or because it needed to happen to confuse the investigation even more. Ruby was a lowlife and he sold himself to the highest bidder--the mob or the feds: take your pick of the two criminal factions!

    Sorry so long, but another reason it had to be a conspiricy is because we were at a point in America where lone gunman just didn't kill presidents. We aren't looking at the days of James Garfield or McKinnely (that is an interesting case). America was both at its most powerful and at its most naive.

    I shall pause.

     
  • At 3:29 PM, Blogger X. Dell said…

    Enemy, I like long answers. No problems there.

    Now that you bring it up, perhaps it would be a good idea to look into the McKinley and Garfield assassinations. In both, lone nuts seem to have been the obvious killer, but such was the case with the Lincoln assassination--yet it was officially deemed a conspiracy and five people hanged for it.

    We have very good evidence of precisely where Oswald was at the time of the assassination. He was in a second-floor lunchroom. Immediately after shots were heard from the Texas School Book Depository, a patrolman, Officer Marion Baker, rushed into the building. He began a search of the second floor along with Oswald's boss. Baker asks if Oswald is an employee, his boss says yes, and then explains to Oswald that the President's been shot. That was ninety seconds at most (probably closer to sixty) after the assassination. According to Baker, Oswald was neither sweating nor puffing, and was pulling a Coke out of the vending machine.

    The elevator operator was on the first floor, where most of the employees actually ate while they played dominoes. Thus, Oswald would have rushed downstairs. The Warren Commission tried to prove that Oswald had ample time to shoot, hide his rifle in the corner, and then race downstairs. But in their first few attempts, they couldn't come close. They then got a track star, who could actually stow the rifle and reach the room in ninety seconds, but even he didn't have time to pull the Coke from the machine.

    And if that doesn't place Oswald on the second floor to anyone's satisfaction, something else should: two employees were coming down the stairs at the time of the shooting. Neither of them saw Oswald.

    I'm beginnng to think that it wasn't the CIA or the FBI or the Mafia or the military per se who killed Kennedy, although people from many different organizations were most likely involved. They had to be. If everyone has a common agenda, then they can act more securely, because everyone has everyone else's back.

    A whole lot of factions hated Kennedy, and not for personality reasons. Everyone knows about Hoover's animosity, the Mafia's and LBJ's. Fewer people realize how many enemies Kennedy had in important industries, among them steel, oil and finance.

    Marina Oswald Porter seems to know much more about the assassination than she's telling (understandable), but she occassionaly will say something cryptic. She has said to consider the Federal Reserve Board as one of JFK's most powerful enemies.

    And they were. JFK ordered the US mint to print money. Before and after JFK, the FRB has had control of America's (and the world's) cash (check your bills). That gave thm a lot of power in dictating what a dollar actually is. But they're not a governmental body. They're a private entity made up of member banks. JFK pretty much took the rug out from under them (temprorarily), taking control of the nation's pursestrings away from corporations, and placing it more squarely with the government.

    President Richard Nixon was in Dallas the day of the assassination meeting with clients, a cartel of oil barrons. According to his aide H.R. Haldeman, they hinted at the assassination to him before it happened. Nixon believed that elements of the Texas Oil industry had ties with the CIA (Howard Hughes and George HW Bush obviously did; Clint Murchinson was rumored have connections with both the CIA and the Mafia).

    Hoover was beholden to this particular cartel, as well. Former Special Agent William Turner wrote that Hoover would try to throw his weight around amongst them, and from time to time they had to remind him that they were his real boss. They would tell him things like, "If we tell you to do X, you do X. If we tell you to do Y, you do Y. If we tell you to wear a dress, then you'll wear a dress." Turner explained this as the reason for Hoover's now famous cross-dressing. His controllers would order him to wear it so that he would remember who's really in charge.

    Nixon himself believed that JFK's death was a conspiracy that originated with this oil cartel and their associates on Wall Street. Because a number of the people used in the operation also appeared in the Bay of Pigs invasion, Nixon referred to the JFK assassination as The Bay of Pigs (he makes a number of references to it on the tapes). Again, that's according to Haldeman.

    That other facets of government had a beef with JFK, I don't think anybody should be surprised if they were complicit. Hoover was not only indebted to the oil industry, but also to the Mafia, due to his gambling addiction. The CIA didn't like him because he reassaigned covert ops to the military during peacetime, thus smashing the Directorate of Operations/Plans, the cloak-and-dagger element of the agency. The military didn't like him because of his defense policies. One of LBJ's benefactors, the firm of Brown & Root (bought by Halliburton in 1964) needed war to drive profits because their money mostly came from construction of military installations, and Kennedy had begun to withdraw from Vietnam, and shut down a planned Cuban invasion.

    So the question isn't who killed Kennedy so much as it is who didn't kill Kennedy.

    And with respect to RFK, one has to keep in mind that after his stroke early in JFK's tenure, Joe Sr. was an invalid, and not a factor in anything.

     
  • At 5:09 PM, Blogger foam said…

    i just love coming back to reread the post and read comments and realize just how little i actually know..
    ...

     
  • At 7:08 PM, Blogger Da Gal said…

    Hey there X!!! Long time no see. Sridhar passed along a hello from you a while back and now that I have resurrected my internet connection I thought I'd stop by and wish you a very happy thanksgiving!

    Hope you are doing well. Hugs, Meg

     
  • At 9:54 PM, Blogger X. Dell said…

    Foam, I love what I learn from commenters as well.

    Wow, Minnesota, this is a treat. SJ and I had been talking about you behind your back. Nothing malicious, just how much we missed you.

    Good to see your avatar. I keep saying to myself that I'm going to send you an e-mail. I'll get around to it. Really.

     
  • At 12:30 AM, Blogger Libby said…

    hey, x, i hope you had a great thanksgiving...shldve done it in ohio, though!!

     
  • At 4:10 AM, Blogger X. Dell said…

    Libby, same back at you. I'll have Ohio for the next holiday season, though.

     
  • At 12:29 PM, Blogger Enemy of the Republic said…

    I was mentioning Joe Sr. as a factor in JFK's death. With RFK, yes, he was no longer viable.

    Those are interesting points. I didn't know that about the mint, but that alone would have pissed off a few. I hadn't considered Nixon, but yes, he is an obvious one because for him it would be personal--oil or not. Of course LBJ had connections to corporate Texan interests--the fact that the killing took place in Texas is not a coincidence, but I would like to know more about how deep Hoover was into this and look more into the Nixon factor. I have never had a handle on the Kennedy killing: only that if it walks,talks and quacks, then it is a duck (conspiricy) and not a lone shooter. Look at the film. Yes, these were the pre Popemobile days, but the bodyguards would have been focusing on the crowds, not buildings or grassy knolls--they were either outfoxed or in on it. And I often wonder if Connelly agreed to get shot or if it were deliberate in order to make it look more haphazard. Interesting that he became a Republican later. Again, the issue has bothered me because I really think it is one of those crimes that we will never know the answer--we will just spin it out. It is a sickening part of American history and I don't say that out of love for JFK; he's another cog in the wheel, but that it shows more agency on the part of the hidden power structure in America and possibly globally that will stoop to every low possible to gain their advantage.

     
  • At 1:14 PM, Blogger foam said…

    are you familiar with a book called
    "apocalypse culture" which is edited by adam parfrey. it's just one of the miriad of books that crowd our bookshelves. i perused it years ago, but not in debth. perhaps due to enemy's recent post i pulled it out of the book shelve. i opened it randomly yesterday evening. it opened on the last chapter..an essay called king kill/33 - masonic symbolism in the assasination of jfk by james shelby downard.

     
  • At 4:47 PM, Blogger X. Dell said…

    Enemy, Hoover was probably into things very deeply. He spent his free time at Santa Anita racetrack, owned by Johnny Roseli. A lot of histories of him describe him as a controlling factor, a power unto himself. But it stands to reason that everyone had bosses.

    A couple of things about the "Popemobile" aspects of the assassination. Col. Fletcher Prouty (in the Oliver Stone movie, he's represented by the character X, played by Donald Sutherland) talks about not only the lack of a bubble top, which would have protected the President, but also the fact that there were numerous open windows in Dealy Plaza, a very fundamental no-no. He also talks about the last-minute pulling away of the most critical Secret Service guards right before entering Dealy Plaza. When the limo goes at walking speed, they are required to walk along side, specifically to cover JFK with their bodies (human shield) in the case gunfire occurs. You can see the guards being pulled out in this clip.

    Second, the night before, a number of the Secret Service personnel waiting for JFK to arrive in Dallas were at an underground nightclub until the wee hours of the morning. So many of them could have had impaired judgment to boot.


    Connelly's defection to the Republican party was quite typical of the 1960s. Up until the New Deal, the most conservative politicans were in the Democratic Party. The Republican party was actually the progressive one. FDR's New Deal put this relationship with ideology in flux, for many of his programs were quite leftist, even socialist in nature (TVA, Social Security, WPA, etc.). Yet, as late as 1964, southern Democrats (among them Connelly) referred to the party as "The White Supremacy Party." This changed, however, very suddenly in 1964 with the hardliner campaign of Sen. Barry Goldwater for the presidency. Subsequently, a number of longtime Democrats (John Connelly, Jessie Helms, Strom Thurmond, etc.) went over to the Republicans.

    I think some of the remaining adherents of the Warren Commission findings do so because they have a hard time believing that elements from government and power would stoop so low. But the documented material we have from the Church, Rockefeller and Pike Commissions show that they, in fact, stooped pretty low, and were only afraid of getting caught with routine illegal activity.

    Foam, I have heard of that book, and am quite familiar with Adam Parfrey's other works (I haven't read that particular one). As The Widow's Son would say, go ahead and read it, but bring your salt shaker.

     
  • At 5:09 PM, Blogger Ray said…

    What a morass. What a headache.

    The whole JFK assassination is a riddle wrapped in a conundrum and then mixed into a blenderful of mysteries.

    But one would think that someone would've come forward by now. "They" didn't eliminate everyone in the know, did they?

    Ray

     
  • At 7:59 PM, Blogger X. Dell said…

    Ray, actually a number of people have come forward, and not all of them died under fishy circumstances. If Baker is to be believed (I have reservations about her), then that would be one, eventually reluctant, insider. More reliable: Julia Ann Mercer, Jean Hill, Juanita Clemmons, and others who actually witnessed the events, and managed to survive.

    Of course Howard Hunt's near-deathbed admission of having participated in the assassination itself as a member of "the B team" would constitute someone from within the conspiracy coming forward. David Ferrie also let Garrison in on a lot of information before his mysterious and timely death. Perry Russo (fictionally portrayed by Kevin Bacon as Willie O'Keefe in the Oliver Stone movie) was more of a bystander who could concretely link Oswald to Shaw, Ferrie and Jack Ruby. Col. Prouty witnessed aspects of the coverup, and managed to relate this information to Garrison and many others over the course of a long life.

    Other than Hale Boggs, who officially endorsed the Warren Commission report, but privately criticized it (as the last dissenting member of the WC), had an inside track to the coverup, and he relayed his knowledge to Jim Garrison before his plane vanished over the Alaskan wilderness.

    So people in various loops did come forward, and spun, more or less, a consistent story.

     
  • At 11:15 PM, Blogger foam said…

    re: the parfrey book:
    i can't really read it in debth.
    much of it is too bizarre for me.
    it has essays on body mutilations and such....which gives me the heeby jeebies. and the masonic kennedy claims seemed real bizarre. but, as an artist it is interesting to me to see how visual symbols and even literary symbols can be interpreted, reinterpreted and perhaps even misinterpreted...

     
  • At 1:20 AM, Blogger X. Dell said…

    Foam, I understand the artist slant. Happy reading.

     
  • At 11:01 PM, Blogger Kate said…

    (_)..(_)
    V

    Happy Wednesday!( almost Thursday!!!)

     

Post a Comment

Linkbacks:

Create a Link

<< Home

Ganesh Map
Click to know more Episode 1Episode 2Episode 3Episode 4Episode 5Episode 6Episode 7Episode 8Episode 9Episode 10Episode 11Episode 12Episode 13Episode 14Episode 15Episode 16
  • Alien Abductions
  • April Fool's Day
  • Mae Brussell
  • Cause-Stalking
  • Chappaqiddick
  • The Children of God Cult
  • Sam Cooke
  • Culture Jamming
  • Exploitation Movies
  • The False Memory Syndrome Foundation
  • Fox, Monsanto and Mystery Milk
  • Games
  • The Gemstone File
  • Gik-Gik
  • The Golden Ganesh (History)
  • The Golden Ganesh (The Radio Drama)
  • The Gulf Breeze UFOs
  • The Grail Mystery
  • Jimi Hendrix
  • Hitlerism vs. Nazism
  • The International Church of Christ
  • Janis Joplin
  • Legends, Hoaxes and the Big Lie
  • Lyndon LaRouche and Jeremiah Duggan
  • John Lennon
  • Marilyn Monroe
  • McMartin Preschool
  • MJ-12
  • Nurse Nayirah
  • Ode to Miss Texas
  • Operational Finance
  • The Paul-Is-Dead Rumor
  • Perverse Science: Biological Determinism
  • Project MK-ULTRA
  • Ruminations on the JFK Assassination
  • Anne Sexton
  • The Summer of 1947
  • The Tate-LaBianca-Hinman-Parent-Hinman-Shea Murders
  • The Symbionese Liberation Army (SLA)
  • Urban Legends
  • The VENONA Ciphers and the Rosenbergs
  • Watergate
  • 9/11
  • Assassinations
  • Chappaquiddick
  • Cults
  • Cyberculture
  • Domestic ops
  • Esoterica
  • Espionage
  • Fiction
  • Games
  • The Golden Ganesh (history)
  • Humor
  • Mafia
  • Media
  • Mind control
  • Nanis
  • New World Order
  • Operation CHAOS
  • Paranoia
  • Parapsychology
  • Personal stuff
  • Political theory
  • Pop Culture
  • Psychology
  • Shameless Plug Division
  • Ufology
  • Weird Science

  • ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------s