For Paper Mountain’s Majesty: The Bubble Bursts
Captain Kevin Randle (USAFR), in his 2002 book Case MJ-12: The True Story behind the Government's UFO Conspiracies, offered a compelling explanation of why the MJ-12 Documents were forgeries. He listed a number of reasons, but I’ll just mention a few of the most salient.
First of all, Roscoe Hillenkoetter, the alleged author of the Eisenhower briefing, seems not to know his own rank. On the header, he refers to (supposedly) himself as Admiral, when in fact he was only a Rear Admiral, a serious faux pas in front of a president who also happened to be first five-star general in American history.
As for Truman’s signature, it had to have been copied or traced onto the photographed page. After diligent research, an exact duplicate of the autograph was found in a letter housed at Truman’s presidential library in Independence, MO. An individual will virtually never sign his name exactly the same way twice in his or her life. There will be countless variations, some microscopic. Here, we have an exact match. Moreover, Truman historians have noted that the president had a tendency to overlap his signature with the text of memos and letters. In the MJ-12 documents the signature appears considerably below the body of the letter, and does not touch the text.
More importantly, this document represents itself as an Executive Order, yet it’s unnumbered. Attachment “A” of the Truman/Forrestal memo cites the creation of MJ-12 as pursuant to “Special Classified Order #092447.” Yes, there is such a thing as a Special Classified Order, but it follows the same numeric sequence as ordinary Executive Orders. In other words, if presented with a list of Executive Orders, they should say something like “#092446 - Blah, blah, blah; #092447 - [Top Secret]; #092448 - Whatever.” Truman indeed changed the guideline for numbering in EO #10006. Still we would have to think that Truman came up with 82,441 more before he got around to creating this panel. That would barely give him time to play the piano. Worse still, the inaugural date listed fell before the change, and thus should have been in the old FDR numerical system, which would make it seven thousand and something.
The documents also contain formatting errors. The dates, as given, are not punctuated correctly in terms of military convention at that time. For example, the date when Brazel showed his UFO to Marcel was given as “07 July, 1947.” The correct expression of this date should be either “7 July 1947" with no comma and no zero, “07 July 1947" with no comma, or “7 July, 1947.” If you found one or two of those, you could simply chalk it up to a mistake on the part of a secretary who was new to the job; but not here where the error is repeated time and again. Also, each new president defines classification terms. Nowhere does the category of “Majic Eyes Only” ever come up as a restriction of any kind.
The documents were photographed on an angle, so it took awhile to figure out that the typewriter used was a Smith-Corona P102. Shandera and Moore quickly moved to find another expert to say that the typeface was actually a Ransmayer & Rodrian 664, or an Underwood UP3A. Sure enough, the fonts look pretty close to what you see in the documents, but only if you don’t account for the angle. When you do, the only one left standing is the Smith-Corona, first manufactured in 1966 -- fourteen years after these documents were supposedly typed.
Moore and Shandera set about to prove the existence of MJ-12. They went to the National Archives to document any precedents for the unusual formats, typeface, et cetera. It was there where they got their hands on some recently declassified material, Record Group 341. The Archives’ administration describes the contents of this record group as follows:
One of the documents in this 74 cubic foot block contained a reference to Majestic-12, according to Jaime Shandera and William Moore. At first glance, that would seem to prove that such a group existed, especially since it exists among other material that might seem related (specifically, the construction and maintenance of air force bases), and dates from the correct time (1948-1954). But Randle argued that this would run counter to the standard, bureaucratic procedures involved with declassifying information. The Library of Congress evaluates whole volumes of documents before recommending that the issuing agency downgrade the classification status. So if there were a project operating under the name of, or tangentially related to, MJ-12, one would expect to find an entire series of documents pertaining to it, not just one. A lone reference to MJ-12 out of context, Randle figured, would very likely not seen the light of day if legitimate.Record Group 341
Records of Headquarters U.S. Air Force (Air Staff)
Administrative HistoryHeadquarters U.S. Air Force, also known as the Air Staff, was established September 18, 1947, under terms of the National Security Act of 1947. The Chief of Staff is directly responsible to the Secretary of the Air Force and presides over the Air Staff which is divided into five functional groupings each headed by a deputy chief of staff.
Records DescriptionDates: 1948-1954
Volume: 74 cubic feet
Records from the Director of Construction, Southwest Region in Fort Worth), who reported t the Office of the Assistant Chief of Staff, Installations. The records relate to construction and maintenance of various air force bases and installations in Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas. Included are correspondence, lists of property, and reports. Nontextual records include site maps.
Finding Aids· Box contents list
· "Places" database in RG 269.
· Entries 505 through 511 in Helene Bowen, comp., Preliminary Inventory of the Records of Headquarters, United States Air Force, NM 15 (1963).
I’d bet good money that those arguing against the existence of UFOs took at least a modicum of joy in declaring the MJ-12 Documents fraudulent. Aviation Week editor and noted UFO “debunker” Philip Klass, who coordinated an MJ-12 report by the Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal (CSICOP) called them “clumsy counterfeits.” CSICOP Committee chair Dr. Paul Kurtz (Philosophy, SUNY Buffalo) described them as “one of the most deliberate acts of deception ever perpetrated against the news media and the public.”
If we accept the documents produced by Shandera and Moore as fraudulent (though some, like Stanton Friedman, still insist that they aren’t), does that necessarily mean MJ-12 never existed? Does it disprove the notion that US military, intelligence services and civilian leaders met with scientific experts about the possibility of extraterrestrial visitation?
Stanton Friedman has stood by his original assertion of the MJ-12 documents’ authenticity. Taking his arguments (which I’ll get to later) into consideration, we are still left asking if the documents are in fact forgeries. Could there be a explanation for their idiosyncrasies?
Before answering those questions, I’d like to bring up something completely different. Hopefully, by series’ end, the connection between this and the following digression will become clear.



17 Comments:
At 1:56 PM,
Charles Gramlich said…
Interesting detective work to find that the signiature was a direct copy.
At 3:45 PM,
Devin said…
I second Charles here Xdell! It will be interesting as always to see what you come up with-this is one of those cases that I would love to be true-but sadly I have always doubted its authenticity-along with that fellow-O dammit my memory-Corso?? I enjoyed your remark about Truman and the piano!-best as always and a very intriguing series either way-there is also a Jenny Randles from the UK who writes on matters paranormal and UFOlogical-of course no relation to Randle (singular:-) but I have found her books interesting-thanks again!!
At 4:46 PM,
Aggie said…
It's all rather surprising really - I didn't tend to think much of all the rumours.
At 10:03 PM,
Ray said…
X. Dell:
In the previous post you had an overview of the purported members of MJ-12. This is the first time I've ever seen someone list them with brief bios. Good job.
As you probably know, there was no love lost between William Moore and Phil Klass. After Klass died, Moore made a nasty comment about him in Saucer Smear.
I did some Googling and I'm suprised in the variations in the accounts of how the info was delivered to Shandera. In Out There by Howard Blum, it thef iles were on a roll of Tri-X 35mm B&W film (exposed by unprocessed). One online source said it was microfilm.
Like you said, for the purposes of this series, it doesn't matter how it was delivered, only that it was given to Shandera. I just find the undeveloped roll of film version to be interesting; it's like something out of a movie thriller, just like how Shadnera and Moore found that info in the national archives. (Cue the suspenseful music; go in for a tight close-up.)
Ray
At 3:20 AM,
SJ said…
I didn't know that about signatures I thought I was the one who couldn't recreate his sign correctly each time.
At 6:25 AM,
Middle Ditch said…
The things that are going on. Interesting.
At 6:42 AM,
foam said…
apparently there's quite compelling evidence that these documents are fraudelent which as you mention doesn't necessarily disproof the existence of this particular group of men. but i'm gonna just sit back and wait for the explanation for their idiosyncracies ..
that's when it becomes fun and interesting .. :)
At 7:27 AM,
X. Dell said…
Charles, it had to be painstaking, as would the search for the typewriter. Ufologists are nothing but dogged in their pursuit of the truth.
Devin, you're thinking about Lt. Col. Phil Corso. In his defense, Corso railed against the inaccuracies put in the book by either his ghostwriter or editorial staff. Before he could make corrections, he suffered a stroke and died. So I don't know how believeable his actual story is.
Jenny Randles' books are interesting, but she doesn't answer her mail. Some of her work betrays a bias that's not immediately apparent. Still, she does better here than many of her BUFORA cohorts--no doubt the fact that she's an Americaphile aids to her popularity here.
Aggie, there are rumors--the kind of shadowy stories whispered beyond earshot of the mainstream--and there's direct allegation. These are direct allegations. And, you're right. They're not very believable. Doesn't make them untrue. But it doesn't make them believable, either.
Ray, thanks. I've been doing some digging to see what percentage of researchers say what. To my surprise, I found out the film version was more prevalent so I'll be emending that post again soon. As for the ongoing posts, I might have to do some on-the-fly editing throughout the series. Fortunately, I have experts like you watching over my shoulder:-)
And that particular scenario is rather melodramatic, no?
Believe it or not, SJ, you're normal....at least with respect to your signature. Of course, you've got a lot of letters in your name, so there's far more opportunity for variation.
Hi, Monique. Wanna hear something funny, I tried several times to settle into Middle Ditch yesterday, and each time, my nephews were crashing about upstairs.
That's okay, because I'm planning an MD marathon for the weekend.
Foam, you can get Stanton Friedman's explanation of the idiosyncracies by clicking the link "still insist that they aren't."
At 2:55 PM,
Libby said…
x---still here...hmmmmm...
At 2:56 PM,
Libby said…
...i say as i stroke my beard thoughtfully...
At 3:57 PM,
dr.alistair said…
corso`s book is very hard to believe. reverse engineering crashed saucer technology...hmmm. pretty arrogant mind-set if untrue. to have us believe he had a desk drawer full of alien technology that he alone delivered to industry....and then wrote a book about it!
lying is a betrayal of trust, and to think that characters like corso and those involved in the mj 12 document issue, and also stanton friedman, who comes across as a monolithic clear thinker and stater of an obvious truth....that alien crashes are real....could so blatantly mislead us over something so important as this bothers me intensely.
but then again, we are constantly lied to by our handlers on just about every issue imaginable, so why would this be any different.
At 11:50 PM,
X. Dell said…
Libby, I'm still here. If you got a beard, then I wonder what kind of meds you're taking now.
Alistair, Corso said he had a file cabinet, but a desk drawer is close enough, I suppose. The point is that it seems intended to mislead due to the sheer nature of the task. After all, what would a career spy know about reverse engineering, just by playing around with some alleged alien artifacts?
At 7:11 AM,
benjibopper said…
i like digressions.
why do i have an easier time believing in a high level group of ufo experts than ufos themselves?
At 3:36 PM,
X. Dell said…
Benjibopper, probably because we've seen high-level men and women(NSC, FBI, a bizillion additional acronyms) handling sensitive tasks before. I, for one, have never seen an alien, so I have a more difficult time believing that they exist.
At 1:00 PM,
benjibopper said…
yes, but if i believe Iche, they are one and the same, those high level dudes and the space aliens.
At 11:46 PM,
Ricardo said…
Sloppy, sloppy, sloppy. Couldn't they take a bit more pride in their forgeries. It's not fun if you screw it up that bad.
At 8:04 PM,
X. Dell said…
Benjibopper, for the record, none of them have shape-shifted before my eyes.
Ricardo, in one sense, the question remains whether or not it is a forgery. While I would bet good money that the information within these documents is inaccurate, in another sense, I believe that they are what they seem--i.e., a government-sourced communication.
Post a Comment
<< Home