For Paper Mountains Majesty: Mooning the Seventh House
When the moon is in the seventh house,
And Jupiter aligns with Mars,
Then peace will guide the planets,
And love will steer the stars.
This is the dawning of the Age of Aquarius
—James Rado & Gerome Ragni, Hair
In 1983, a year before Jaime Shandera received MJ-12 documents in the mail, Sgt. Richard Doty, a counterintelligence non-commissioned officer (CIC NCO) working with the Air Force Office of Special Investigations (AFOSI), met with Linda Mouton Howe (left) in his office at Kirtland AFB (Albuquerque, NM). Unlike some retired beauty queens, Howe (Miss Idaho 1963) could boast of some rather impressive achievements, among them a Master’s Degree in communications from Stanford University and an Emmy for environmental reporting. As a journalist, her beat included coverage of the real-life carnage of animal mutilation in the US Southwest, and from there on she became interested in the subject of UFOs.Although obviously a clever woman, Howe has the reputation both inside and outside of ufology of being (how can I say this?) quirky, and somewhat gullible. I’ve never met the woman personally. I know of her only from her writing and interviews, so I cannot comment on whether she deserves the reputation or not. If the depiction is accurate, one would normally regard her investigations with a pillar of salt. But with respect to this meeting with Doty, gullibility might ironically add credibility to her account of these events.
Howe originally contacted USAF officials to do research for a planned HBO documentary about a purported UFO landing and ET meeting at Holloman AFB in 1971. These officials put her in touch with Doty, who surprised her by flatly stating that the landing and meeting actually took place, but in 1964, not 1971. He then told her that his “superiors” wanted him to show her a stack of documents, although he forbid her to photograph, copy or take notes on them. Said Howe, “I took the papers and read the top page. It was entitled ‘Briefing for the President of the United States of America’ on the subject of unidentified and identified aerial craft or vehicles.”
Deeper down, she read papers detailing an extraterrestrial plan to genetically manipulate Earth’s primates and other intelligent species during specific points in our development: approximately 25,000, 15,000 and 2,500 years ago. Most spectacularly, the documents claimed that the space visitors created a human/alien hybrid around the year 4 B.C., who seems very Christ-like from the description.
Moreover, these documents said that the US government had considerable knowledge about ET activities around Earth, and had already begun surveillance on the visitors. British ufologist Timothy Good described the meeting in his 1993 book Alien Contact: Top-Secret UFO Files Revealed:
The briefing paper also listed a number of United States Government projects that had been established in order to study the alien question. These included Project Garnet, which had studied (and apparently resolved) all questions relating to the evolution of mankind; Project Sigma, an ongoing project, initiated in 1964 (presumably following the Holloman landing), dealing with alien communication; Project Snowbird, a continuing research effort into the development and implementation of alien spacecraft technology; and Project Aquarius, an overall project devoted to the accumulation of all available information about ‘Alien Life forms.’In a subsequent letter to ufologist Barry Greenwood, Doty stipulated that the meeting took place (under the direct monitoring of his supervisor, a man he referred to as ‘FALCON,’) but denied that he allowed Howe to peruse secret documents:
I can tell you, without a doubt, that I never showed her any such document. First of all, I was not in a position to obtain any presidential briefing documents. Secondly, I would not allow a person without a security clearance to see any such document.... Finally, I know of no secret Government investigation of UFOs....Howe responded to Doty’s denial by signing a notarized (but unsworn) statement reasserting her earlier characterization of the meetings.
In this particular he-said-she-said argument, I would tend to give the nod of credibility to Howe, for several reasons. First off, I’m more inclined to believe gullible people because of the old-fashioned Freudian/Horneyan concept known as ‘externalization.’ Many people develop a neurotic tendency to project their motives, beliefs, MOs onto mankind in general. A liar figures that everyone else must be dishonest too (which in a weird way, bolsters his belief that he is more honest than everyone else, for he acknowledges his deceit). Likewise, a person who is basically honest could neurotically believe that most people are honest, just like him. So, if Howe says that Doty showed her documents while at Kirtland, I’m inclined to believe that he showed her documents while at Kirtland.
Of course, I would be a piss poor researcher if I believed her based only on that reason. I would have to also point out that later incidents would underscore Sgt. Doty’s deceptiveness, most notably in his handling of Howe and another UFO researcher, Paul Bennewitz. And if you’re assuming that ufologists were the only ones questioning Doty’s credibility, then assume something else. Although he believed that there were no secret government investigations of UFOs, a very prominent UFO debunker (specifically Phil Klass) had trouble buying into Doty’s entire story (although Klass’ opinion of Howe wasn’t very good either).
Second, the statements that Doty makes here and elsewhere strike me as doublespeak stemming from plausible deniability. The language he uses in the above letter doesn’t really address Howe’s account. For example, when he says he never showed her the document, we have to wonder how he defines the word “show.” Did he shove a manila folder into her face and screech, “LOOK AT THIS!” or did he simply leave it on his desk, whereupon Howe asked what it was, and asked permission to go through it. In the latter example, did he really show the document to Howe? And even if he didn’t have permission to obtain such a document, that doesn’t preclude the possibility that someone gave it to him. After all, while I’m in DC, my sister can check out a library book for me because I don’t have a card. I’m not authorized to obtain the book, but there it is in my possession. If he wouldn’t allow her to see “such a [presumably sensitive] document,” could that mean the papers Howe reports seeing in his office might not be classified at all—especially useful if the paperwork is propaganda? And he could very well be telling the truth that he knows of no secret investigations into UFOs. After all, that would imply that these papers were formally classified, as opposed to simply government-generated documents.
Third, Doty had reached out to UFO researchers before, either as a representative of a superior officer codenamed FALCON, or as FALCON himself.



19 Comments:
At 10:29 AM,
Charles Gramlich said…
I once did a story about an Alien Christ. It still hasn't sold.
Maybe it's a conspiracy to keep the truth at bay?
At 2:42 PM,
dr.alistair said…
the alien christ thing has been done before....apparently an extra-terrestrial sent his only son to die for our sins....or some such blah, blah, blah...
At 2:48 PM,
dr.alistair said…
and, yeah....howe`s inquiry into ufo related phenomena has always been niave and child-like in it`s curiosity. an approach i prefer to the arms-folded prove it or else approach some take to the subject.
your analysis of the trustworthiness of doty vs. howe is interesting also.
are all projections neurotic, or is it the fruedian approach that tells us so?
At 3:11 PM,
Devin said…
Fantastic article as always Xdell! I was wondering if you had any thoughts on Linda Moulton Howe and was delighted to see in this article that you did and some analysis of her personality also-She has always interested me-but I agree with dr alistair on some points. Someone else in netland that I respect and like says she is CIA-but never offered any more proof than his word that she was-Howe and Whit Strieber and several others seem to work along some of the same lines in this convoluted (to say the least) subject and it is so hard to know what is up or down and true or false-very much appreciate your thoughts on this in this article!! I am enjoying this series and hope you are having a fantastic week-all the best!!
At 5:41 PM,
Libby said…
x--i wondered when linda moulton howell's name would show up! i remember hearing her name on coast-to-coast am when i used to listen to that all the time!!
At 6:16 PM,
X. Dell said…
Charles, I'm about a fourth of the way through Cold in the Light. Seems as though you have at least the Mother Mary figure in Raina.
Dr. Alistair, you're right. I can think of such stories as Brother from Another Planet and Starman off the top of my head.
I don't think of think of Howe as neurotic in particular. I wouldn't know. Perhaps the tendency to externalize is universal, but to varying degrees. Horney defined neurosis in terms of inflexibility, which on a fundamental level is manefest in strong character traits.
Don't get me wrong, I appreciate Howe for what she does have to offer, as I appreciate everyone else in ufology--or anyone, actually, who appreciates this subject matter. That doesn't mean that I'm an acolyte, though.
Devin, I would have to see some evidence that Howe (or Strieber or the rest of them) are CIA. Some say that this person or that's CIA because they articulate the Agency's point of view. Of course, that presumes that the critic actually knows the CIA's agenda. Then too, you really have a strange situation when half of the people within ufology are accusing the other half of being spies--most likely because they disagree.
A person can be wrong, or misguided. hey might even (gasp) disagree with you. That doesn't mean that they're with the Company. If anything, I think the confusion and suspicion among fellows keeps this subject in the margins. If the CIA wanted to diminish interest in the subject, that's one way to do it.
Libby, she used to be on C2C quite frequently. She and Strieber are quite visible. They're arguably the most famous ufologists around.
At 7:21 PM,
dr.alistair said…
except that strieber is clearly a liar....
At 8:23 PM,
Ray said…
Gee, I wonder how much intelligence work Richard Doty conducted after his "promotion" to a USAF commissary.
Ray
At 11:53 PM,
SJ said…
The Age if Aquarius has turned out to be a bit of a let down hasn't it? Maybe they didn't predict a neocon revival?
At 12:34 AM,
Aggie said…
Ha ... now the music is stuck in my head. Lol!
I'm just not sure what a govt hopes to gain by keeping UFO intelligence under wraps? - I cannot imagine anything they come up with setting off a panic - so there seems no reason (if it's true in the first place and they have evidence of it) to hide it.
Also, from a UFO's point of view - why hide?
At 5:08 AM,
Helene (the Artist Formerly Known as Kate) said…
like Aggie I am now singing that song! (at least I like the song...)
I liked the movie Starman... although I dont know if I would go as far as to say he was 'Christ like'... he did good and miraculous things, but... Although I suppose, if you asked me, I would tell you I dont believe Christ was God either...
At 12:48 PM,
foam said…
"Third, Doty had reached out to UFO researchers before, either as a representative of a superior officer codenamed FALCON, or as FALCON himself."
so, are you going to tell us about this? seems that doty might be a liar and that howe might have just been deceived?
At 1:57 PM,
X. Dell said…
Dr. Alistair, you'd probably have a better take on that than I do. I had a hard time buying into such things as The Secret School, mostly because of the hyperbolic way in which the author depicts himself. My first impression was gross exaggeration for the purpose of sexing up a book. But if you see him as a liar (and you're not the only one), who am I to argue?
Ray, as I'm sure you know, the commissary detail was a supposed punishment for Doty's transgressions regarding this UFO business. The exact reason for the alleged disciplinary action has never been clear to me. Was it because he divulged classified information? Was it beecause he used his office at Kirtland AFB to play a grand prank on the UFO community? Was it (what servicemen call) a "tit [easy or no-show] job," to reward him for sewing the seeds of disinformation so skillfully? Did they (as the military is wont to do at times) simply transfer him to another detail?
Whatever it was, anything construed as a discplinary transfer might aid the illusion (okay, perception) that Doty pissed off Uncle Sam. I'm sure some would see that as "proof" that Doty actually leaked classified material.
SJ, it's interesting you should say that. Some would say that the agendas of the "new age" and those of the neo-cons are a perfect marriage.
Aggie, that song was a little before your time, but it is kinda catchy. I should have posted an earwig warning.
I would agree with you that governments would have much to gain by releasing info on extraterrestrial visitation, if that's what it truly is. I will point out, however, that others would have good reason to disagree with us. After the Washington National flyovers of multiple UFOs over Washington DC (tracked on radar, covered in the papers and on TV, photographed etc.) the CIA's Robertson Panel (a study group on UFO policy) made the reecommendation to "debunk" (their word) the existence of UFOs. The Washington sightings were so startling that DC's phone system got overloaded--extremely critical situation. So the government really is hiding information about UFOs. That's not to say that they're hiding anything about gray men from outser space. I'll explain later (hopefully to your satisfaction).
Helene, I wouldn't say that he is a Christ figure, but the character is Christ-like, and he has some of the attributes that Charles alluded to.
And I suppose that you wouldn't worship Christ as a God.
By the way, Kate, I'll be e-mailing you soon.
Foam, Doty was certainly not forthcoming, and Howe, if not deceived, was perhaps persuaded. That Doty tried to shape a UFO orthodoxy is beyond question at this point. What we have to ask ourselves was whether he did it for his own private kicks, or did he do it under orders. As we will see, there will be other government people affirming these stories.
At 4:01 PM,
Devin said…
Thanks for your thoughts on my comment Xdell!! I also appreciate all of the other commenters here so much. One massive problem with people in conspiracyland (I have fallen into the trap also) is making huge blanket statements ie-Howe is CIA and then nada to back it up-not even a feeling or suggestion. I would love to get your thoughts and all who read your blog (someday-this is way OT for the current series) on the thought out there that both Nazi Germany and the USSR were essentially created by "them" -CIA, Illuminati-on and on-I here some people out there making this blanket statement all the time-I mean man-when you do that-you gotta have something to back it up-not saying its wrong-I will entertain any notion if the person is respectful and serious-but I wish when people did this they at least had some notion of PROOF when they talk like this-again enjoy your blog and the commenters here so much-thanks for all of your hard work-great new series!!
At 4:18 PM,
dr.alistair said…
fair enough x. i have a dvd series with interviews of abduction experiencers from around the world and the interview with strieberis almost comical in it`s portrayal of a man clearly uncomfortable with the re-telling of a tale long since past.
the dvd is part of a box set called aliens; the complete truth, comprised of five discs interviewing people from the us, mexico, belgium, italy, switzerland, japan and russia.
the series basically made my mind up that the people being interviewed were either deluded, hallucinating, covering some other experience, or outright lying.
this doesn`t mean that there are others who have had genuine abduction experiences....just not these folks.
jung said that, in his opinion, the ufo experience would become the leading religion by the latter part of the 20th century...
i find the crop circle phenomenon to be more compelling.
At 6:16 AM,
X. Dell said…
Devin, there's more than enough evidence to contradict the conventional view that Nazism was a movement localized to Germany during the 1920s, 1930s and 1940s. It makes more sense to see it as an international movement that is ongoing.
I'm unsure as to the basis of the illuminati/communist rumor, but I have seen that a lot of people link the two (erroneously, as it turns out) to the London School of Economics, saying that a lot of the Soviet revolutionries were trained there. Even if that were true, one would have to keep in mind that LSE has a wide diversity of alums--from JFK to Mick Jagger--none of whom have anything to do with communism.
Perhaps some link them together with illuminati because they see both as an extreme, and thus see them as foreign and therefore anti-American/British/Western. Of course, that's when you refer to the labels, and not to the underlying philosophy behind them. The same people who would see something conspiratorial in communism would probably be surprised that their values are essentially communistic--which makes sense since most people are of the working class. At the same time, they might be appalled to see how much of their "values" stem from fascistic thought.
Alistair, Jung enthused over UFOs precisely because he thought that psychiatry had this perfect opportunity to examine a religion in the making.
I see where you're coming from with respect to the video that you cite. I would caution, however, that sometimes videos can be edited in such a way as to give speakers more or less credibility. Then again, one could probably get a sense from just the sound. Your sense is that he's lying. My sense is that he's grossly exaggerating. Either way, neither of us are going to say that we definitely know the truth because we have read his books or listened to his interviews.
At 10:03 AM,
dr.alistair said…
with regard to strieber, his entire tone and pace and inflection changed when he recounted his abduction experience. the main thrust of his interview was talking about what he felt to be the government`s involvements in his and other abductions and the anger he felt toward them and this section had the normal voice tone and pitch of someone showing minor upset and irritation....but once he began to go into what happened to him he slowed down and his facial expressions saddened and he began to weigh his words much more. technical discussion about eye movement aside, he exhibited classic symptoms of someone who was being evasive.
i got the immpression he was re-living an experience he had had, but was editing, distorting and deleting aspects to fit an abduction scenario.
homosexuality possibly?
not that in 2009 it needs to be covered up, but he may think so.
he came across as a tragic figure struggling to say what he really needed to say and finding comfort in a community of people willing to listen to this kind of speculation.
At 9:08 AM,
X. Dell said…
I think I see where you're coming from, Alistair. Interesting observations.
At 9:26 AM,
SJ said…
I am afraid I have no such profundity behind my comment. I was just commenting on the "peace" part of the song.
Post a Comment
<< Home