The Urban Legend of the Glass Hack
Two weeks before I actually moved to Manhattan, I had to meet with the housing administrator so I could pick out an apartment. As she showed me around, one of the residents, a tall, obscenely pretty brunette in cut-off shorts and tee shirt, came by to wash her dishes in the communal kitchen. I made a comment to the housing administrator how nice the kitchen looked. The brunette, intercepting the comment, griped about how the other residents never cleaned up after themselves, or at least very well, and she had to do it all herself.
I had to admit the woman was eye candy. But with a temper like that, I made a mental note to avoid her. As I saw her more and more, I got this, I don’t know, bad vibe whenever she walked into the room. It was as if a sudden chill had frosted the air. With her olive complexion, long raven locks, and permanent scowl, I sometimes toyed with the notion that she was part Romulan.
Of course, we couldn’t avoid each other. We were living in the same building, studying in the same department, sharing the same office space at the university, and had joint research projects assigned to us. But it wasn’t so bad. It took her some time to soften up, and it took me a little more time to trust her not to bite me in a foaming rage. Long story short, we became friends. In fact, she became one of the closest friends of my life.
She had a few years on me, and she used that time to achieve a few noteworthy things. In fact, at the Lincoln Center Library for the Performing Arts, while researching something else, I happened to come across a magazine article about her. Right there, in the first paragraph, was the story of Philip Glass’ run-in with a young music student, who, after looking at his hack license, informed him that there was a famous composer by that name.
Here’s the kicker: the article identified my friend as the woman who stepped into that cab.
If I ever had a doubt about the story's veracity, I didn’t anymore. After all, I could see my friend making the comment. I had learned earlier (from someone else) that she and Glass knew each other. I figured that must have been how they met.
Excited, I photocopied the article, took it to my building, made a b-line for my friend’s apartment, and shoved it in her face as soon as she opened the door. “I heard about this in my undergraduate twentieth century music class,” I blurted. “I had no idea that woman was you. Why didn’t you say anything?”
She let out a loud sigh. When I lowered the photocopy I saw her eyes narrowing into that familiar Romulan scowl. “Oh, that again,” she spat.
Okay, I can see where the story makes her look somewhat, um, daffy. And she’s so serious I can see where discussion of it would make her uncomfortable. But as it turns out, she objected to it for another reason.
“It’s not true,” she said. “It never happened.”
She then explained that she actually met Glass at a party. As a twentieth century music expert, she knew his work quite well, and held it in high esteem (in fact, I can just picture her gushing over him at this point). Glass, keeping things real, told her that it didn’t make him money. In fact he had to drive a cab to make ends meet.
She then quipped, “Good thing I didn’t step into your cab. I might’ve said something stupid, like, ‘You know, there’s a famous composer with your name.’”
And that’s how it started: as an off-hand joke told at a party.
At least according to my friend.
See, that’s the thing. I trust my friend. I trust my professors. And the magazine article said she was this woman. Both she and my professor are honest. Neither would knowingly lie to me. Of course, I believe my friend, because the story is about her. She would be in a better position to know.
This brings up all the issues involved with conflicting sources. Had I never met this woman, I would have probably gone to my grave thinking the story true. But just how does one make heads or tails of a story when all the sources disagree on the who, what, when, why and where?
Welcome, my friends, to the wonderful lands of misinformation and disinformation, a world very familiar to many conspiracy researchers.
I had to admit the woman was eye candy. But with a temper like that, I made a mental note to avoid her. As I saw her more and more, I got this, I don’t know, bad vibe whenever she walked into the room. It was as if a sudden chill had frosted the air. With her olive complexion, long raven locks, and permanent scowl, I sometimes toyed with the notion that she was part Romulan.
Of course, we couldn’t avoid each other. We were living in the same building, studying in the same department, sharing the same office space at the university, and had joint research projects assigned to us. But it wasn’t so bad. It took her some time to soften up, and it took me a little more time to trust her not to bite me in a foaming rage. Long story short, we became friends. In fact, she became one of the closest friends of my life.
She had a few years on me, and she used that time to achieve a few noteworthy things. In fact, at the Lincoln Center Library for the Performing Arts, while researching something else, I happened to come across a magazine article about her. Right there, in the first paragraph, was the story of Philip Glass’ run-in with a young music student, who, after looking at his hack license, informed him that there was a famous composer by that name.
Here’s the kicker: the article identified my friend as the woman who stepped into that cab.
If I ever had a doubt about the story's veracity, I didn’t anymore. After all, I could see my friend making the comment. I had learned earlier (from someone else) that she and Glass knew each other. I figured that must have been how they met.
Excited, I photocopied the article, took it to my building, made a b-line for my friend’s apartment, and shoved it in her face as soon as she opened the door. “I heard about this in my undergraduate twentieth century music class,” I blurted. “I had no idea that woman was you. Why didn’t you say anything?”
She let out a loud sigh. When I lowered the photocopy I saw her eyes narrowing into that familiar Romulan scowl. “Oh, that again,” she spat.
Okay, I can see where the story makes her look somewhat, um, daffy. And she’s so serious I can see where discussion of it would make her uncomfortable. But as it turns out, she objected to it for another reason.
“It’s not true,” she said. “It never happened.”
She then explained that she actually met Glass at a party. As a twentieth century music expert, she knew his work quite well, and held it in high esteem (in fact, I can just picture her gushing over him at this point). Glass, keeping things real, told her that it didn’t make him money. In fact he had to drive a cab to make ends meet.
She then quipped, “Good thing I didn’t step into your cab. I might’ve said something stupid, like, ‘You know, there’s a famous composer with your name.’”
And that’s how it started: as an off-hand joke told at a party.
At least according to my friend.
See, that’s the thing. I trust my friend. I trust my professors. And the magazine article said she was this woman. Both she and my professor are honest. Neither would knowingly lie to me. Of course, I believe my friend, because the story is about her. She would be in a better position to know.
This brings up all the issues involved with conflicting sources. Had I never met this woman, I would have probably gone to my grave thinking the story true. But just how does one make heads or tails of a story when all the sources disagree on the who, what, when, why and where?
Welcome, my friends, to the wonderful lands of misinformation and disinformation, a world very familiar to many conspiracy researchers.
Labels: inaccuracy2, personal stuff, urban legends



10 Comments:
At 2:16 AM,
Devin said…
Wow! What a fascinating story Xdell!!
and to think it comes from your personal archives.
As always I'm totally hooked now!!
One of the largest problems -for me anyway (and thanks btw for bringing so much of my thinking around to what I feel is a more complete-"truer" light) in looking into conspiracy theories is who to trust?-how much can you take at face value?-are there any parts of the researchers theory that seems obivous to them that don't seem so obvious -or let's say "given" to you? and so on.
I would love to know the actual amount of money US.gov spends on disinformation per year.
all the best to you as always my friend!!
At 3:50 PM,
X. Dell said…
Devin, I wouldn't know how much money the government spends on disinformation (part of PSYOP), but the subject is always close to heart. I just finished reading a Naval War College paper on the need to expand PSYOP campaigns on the Internet, liking any sort of criticism from anyone (US citizen or critic) to an actual attack (literally an act of war). The expansion of inacting disinfo on the web is in someways ferreting through legal issues. The paper points out that while military (or for that matter civilian) Intel may not lie to the American public, they may, by law, lie to an enemy. The problem I had with this paper was that the term "enemy" was defined so broadly that it could (and probably would) constitute any critic of martial policy.
I didn't think about it when I began writing this series, but at the end I might allude to Newman and Newman's excellent book Evidence.
At 11:48 PM,
Ray said…
X. Dell:
In my comment with the previous post I was wondering if that first part was part of a series pertaining to Phil Glass. With other series you used a main title and then a subtitle for a particular post (for example, "The Grounded Walrus: The Grassy Elevator?")
Now I see from the second post that this series will deal with much more than the Phil Glass urban legend. And with each post having a date and time stamp, there is no need for the title:subtitle format. Anyway, that's why I was a bit confused before.
You've mentioned that work has been sapping your strength. The classic dilemma: work or blogging. Well, one has to pay the rent. Work is making a living. Blogging is living.
Good to hear that I inspired this series. Now I've got to inspire myself and get some writing done. Lately the heat has been sapping me. I can't imagine what it's like there in DC. I was there one summer and it was the cliche that you could fry an egg on the sidewalk. But I was much younger back then...
Ray
PS: CAPTCHA verification word for this comment: dialko. Phone service for women to call in Kotex orders?
At 2:53 AM,
SJ said…
I am sure when you are the way to your grave you wouldn't be doing any thinking. This looks like the start of another interesting series.
At 9:06 AM,
foam said…
you are so very clever with your intros, x.dell.
i didn't really specifically know where you were going in the first part, but was interested, esp. since i have seen a performance and knew you had a personal story to tell. then you hook us with that personal story
....
and now i want more, right now..
if you make us wait as long as you have in previous posts i just might bust with impatience.
and that wouldn't be pretty.
At 10:40 AM,
X. Dell said…
Ray, I see what you mean. In this case, the operant word wasn't 'glass,' but rather 'legend.'
Actually, I'm suffering through the heat of Cincinnati, not DC, these days.
SJ, how can you say that unless you have been to the grave? Maybe you'll think all sorts of thoughts along the procession, such as, "I never should've turned my back on that witch and her retractable stick."
Foam, I hope not to have as many delays, although there will be some.
At 12:40 PM,
SJ said…
You mean foam right?
At 1:04 PM,
X. Dell said…
SJ, how do I know you haven't PO'ed an army of women possessing long retractable sticks?
At 1:36 PM,
foam said…
there's just no telling how many ....
sj, can consider himself whacked upside the head, btw ... :)
you too
... :)
At 1:37 PM,
X. Dell said…
There goes Foam, whacking off again.
Post a Comment
Linkbacks:
Create a Link
<< Home