Legends, Hoaxes and the Big Lie: Mystery Milk
In 1996, husband and wife reporting team Steve Wilson and Jane Akre (left) thought they had landed their dream job when hired by Fox-owned affiliate WTVT (Tampa, FL). The station assigned them to produce a series of stories called “The Investigators,” its tagline, “Uncovering the truth. Getting results. Protecting you.”Early on, Wilson and Akre decided to investigate the health consequences of recombinant bovine growth hormone (rBGH) injected into dairy cattle. Despite the fact that rBGH increased milk production by as much as 25%, farmers using it noted that their cows were increasingly suffering from udder infections and hoof problems, and dying younger. When prodded by Akre and Wilson to explain why they used it if that were the case, the farmers reluctantly explained that Monsanto, the company that sold rBGH under the brand name Posilac, threatened to sue them if they didn’t.
More important, a number of studies showed a link between rBGH and cancer. The hormone did not break down in the body of the cow, and was subsequently secreted through the milk, something that might (pending further study) influence human development at the DNA level.*
The reporters compiled their story and presented it to their boss, General Manager David Boylan. Boylan enthusiastically ordered promos shot with the introductory teaser, “What’s in your milk?”
Thinking that they had just hit one out of the park, Akre and Wilson were understandably surprised when Boylan called them in to make some “edits” to their original piece in order to make it more “fair and balanced.” Boylan’s change in attitude stemmed from a directive by Fox News President Roger Ailes. As one of the twenty-two local stations owned by Fox, WTVT had to submit to Ailes’ control. The fact that Monsanto had purchased a large chunk of advertising time on Fox weighed heavily in his decision.
Fox offered Wilson and Akre $200,000 for their resignation, and a promise to keep the story a secret. But Akre and Wilson went to bat for their piece, and finally reached a compromise. If the station would delay production for just a little while, they would draft a script that they, the station and Monsanto could live with. Eighty-three versions later, the reporters still couldn’t water down the piece enough to suit the chemical leviathan. They eventually offered Fox an ultimatum: if WTVT didn’t air the true story, they would report the station to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) for “broadcasting false signals.” So, Fox fired them in December 1997.
Meanwhile, WTVT aired a version of Wilson and Akre’s report approved by Monsanto. If you’re assuming that the approved script turned a piece about corporate malfeasance into a VNR for rBGH, then you make good assumptions.
_______________________________
*One fear about rBGH, for example, is that it might cause early pubescence in girls. (Update 8/30/10: Ray--of Ray's-X--has found these links from The Daily Mail and The Huffington Post.)
Labels: inaccuracy, inaccuracy2, media, mystery milk



11 Comments:
At 9:01 PM,
Ricardo said…
This is why I always get into arguments with people saying it's a "liberal media" and things are politically motivated. It's a corporate media which has impact all all things including political reporting but it all come down to dollars, revenue. I saw this all the time. none of this shocks me but it's sad.
At 10:23 PM,
SJ said…
The story sure seemed to have moo-ved Monsanto into action. They must be full of bull-excreta.
Udderly fascinating post one of you butter posts if not the best.
At 11:03 PM,
Charles Gramlich said…
Definitely a corporate media and a corporate world.
At 6:01 PM,
Devin said…
Thanks for this Xdell!!
There was a link to this story at a discussion forum a few weeks ago -so this is one I had actually heard about before--but I don't feel it can be stated (or blogged/vlogged whatever) enough as to what happened "Fair and Balanced" indeed -
I so agree and have argued with people about the "liberal" media--as Ricardo says here- to me the "media" are mostly bought out whores --I am still shocked every now and then by how far things have gone downhill in the last years -but I don't know why anything would shock me anymore out of gov't and media/corps!!
all the best in the world to you my friend!!
At 11:07 PM,
Ray Palm said…
Liberal, conservative -- when I comes to the mainstream for-profit media, as long as the money flows in, each outlet will dance to any tune.
Once again, X. Dell, you've introduced me to another story (Wilson and Akre) that I've never heard of. Not that I have my head stuck in the sand; it's information overload.
I am familiar with the controversy over rBGH. This area is big on dairy farming, especially across the lake over in Vermont. When the controversy first heated up, it was reported in the local news how some farmers/milk producers wanted to put a label on their milk that it was rBGH free and Monsanto threatened to sue them. If there's no rBGH in the milk, then why not label it?
Gee, corporations acting like bullies. Huh.
At 11:20 PM,
SJ said…
BTW Monsanto is trying to sell genetically modified seeds to Indian farmers which by itself isn't wrong. The accusations of them bribing officials for contracts and declarations of safety are of course untrue and made by crazy socialists.
At 8:34 AM,
X. Dell said…
Ricardo, that's my reaction to those who claim the mainstream media has a liberal bias.
SJ, that's interesting. I'm making a mental note to see how the Indian government reacts to the introduction of genetically enhanced seeds, what type of testing they require, and so on.
Charles, it's the golden rule: he who has the gold, makes the rules.
Devin, Fox isn't the only mainstream media outlet guilty of this, but their behavior has been so eggregious that they should set off gullibility meters around the world. Because of their starkness in using information to influence political agendas (note I didn't say propaganda), they're an easy example.
Ray, as I will post later in this series, Monsanto lobbied a number of state legislators to push forth laws that prohibited labelling something rBGH-free. Seems to me a flagrant violation of First Ammendment rights, but it's not without precedent. Across the US South, some state legislatures have passed what are called "food libel laws," making it difficult for anyone to level any criticism against the food industry.
At 7:15 PM,
foam said…
i loath monsanto with a passion.
At 8:05 PM,
X. Dell said…
I'm curious, Foam. What's your experience with them?
At 12:10 PM,
benjibopper said…
Ah Fox, god love ya, no one else will. Fox and Monsanto, the perfect marriage.
X, sorry if my last comment was harsh - my frustration is not with you of course but with the very topic of your post. I'm loving this series. It hits home for me.
At 8:09 PM,
X. Dell said…
Benjibopper, intensity can be a good thing.
Post a Comment
<< Home