Monday, July 25, 2011

A Real Love for Big Cheats: The Truth Crimes of Daddy’s Little Bitch

The night of my cousin's wedding
I wore blue.
I was nineteen
and we danced, Father, we orbited….

Mother was a belle and danced with twenty men.
You danced with me never saying a word.
Instead the serpent spoke as you held me close.
The serpent, that mocker, woke up and pressed against me
like a great god and we bent together
like two lonely swans.
--Anne Sexton, from “How We Danced

Theme Seven:  Incest and Molestation

When Anne Sexton first displayed the “Elizabeth” personality, she constantly talked about something that Sexton herself couldn’t say.  In one of her typed-in-the-dark letters to Dr. Martin Orne, “Elizabeth” exhorted the shrink to administer sodium pentothal so that Anne would tell him some deep dark secret.

Sodium pentothal is a barbituate that doctors might give to a patient for a number of reasons.  They can use it as anesthetic, to inhibit phobias, or to induce a coma.*   But here, Anne/Elizabeth is asking for its use as “truth serum.”  The purpose here would be similar to that of a criminal suspect begging to take a polygraph.  Both the suspect and Sexton want their examiners to believe that they‘re speaking the truth.

“Elizabeth” specified that she wanted Dr. Orne to administer the drug to Anne so that the latter could finally talk about something that was at the core of her psychic injuries:  her turbulent relationship with her alcoholic father, and the degeneration of her relationship with Aunt Nana.  

If you’re wondering why Dr. Orne might not believe Sexton if she talked about something exceedingly personal, it’s because Sexton admitted to deliberately lying about her past:  transgressions she frequently referred to as “truth crimes.”  In one instance, she told Orne about an incident she had on one summer vacation when, as a little girl, she was raped by a family friend.  In the next session she claimed that she had deliberately made up the story on the spot--sort of an improvisatory narrative, if you will.  As she herself once said:
I am nothing, if not an actress off the stage.  In fact, it comes down to the terrible truth that there is no true part of me. . . . . . It is as if I will permit my therapy and think it all very interesting as long as it doesn’t touch me.  I am a story-maker, a--doesn’t it strike him as odd that this ‘story’ is too pat?”
This posed a problem in assessing the veracity of what Sexton said in treatment.  It’s for this reason that nieces Lisa Tompson and Mary Ford objected to Orne’s release of the tapes in the first place.  Even in context one could consider them possibly defamatory, especially because of the explosive nature of this secret that Anne wanted to hide, but “Elizabeth” wanted to expose.

During the initial appearance of the “Elizabeth” persona, Dr. Orne noticed the increasing use of the epithet “little bitch.”  Moreover, he began to associate it with “Elizabeth,” but not Anne.  In probing this further, Sexton lapsed into a trance, where the following revelation took place:
Sexton:  Father comes in drunk; wakes me up, saying ‘I just wanted to see where you were--your sister [Jane] is out letting someone feel her.’  And he says it again.  Sits on the bed, takes a bottle out of his pocket and drinks.  I asked where Mommy was; gone to bed and locked the door.  He says, ‘Do you like me?’

Orne:  What side of the bed is he sitting on?
Sexton: [Points with finger.] He asks me if anybody ever felt me.  I don’t know what he means.  I lay down and cuddle with Nana.  I know that isn’t good, I shouldn’t.

Orne:  Shouldn’t what?

Sexton:  He is holding me.  He says to press up against him, sort of wriggles and asks if I like it.  And it feels good.

Orne:  Does he say you are a good girl?

Sexton:  He puts his hand on me and asks if I--if I ever do this and did I ever do it.

Orne:  What did you tell him?

Sexton: [Shakes head]:  He kissed me on the lips and he started to leave and I held on and didn’t want him to go.  Then he came back, left his bottle on the table.”
Here, Sexton accused not just her father, but her Aunt Nana of sexually abusing her.  Once conscious of this, Sexton explored the theme of incest in her writing.  The subject rings as clearly as a bell in such poems as “How We Danced.”  It also serves at the core of her play 45 Mercy Street, a pivotal scene in which depicts a freshly adolescent girl (thirteenish) being intimately fondled by her father, while an elderly woman (reminiscent of Aunt Nana) listens in from the next room. 

Dr. Orne said that he did not automatically believe the allegation.  He subsequently interviewed family members to see if Sexton’s claim of childhood sexual abuse had any merit, and found that  others could corroborate a noticeable friction between Sexton and her father.  After all, Ralph Harvey not only drank, but was excessively formal inside the home.  Sexton found herself rebelling against these tendencies early and often.  But Orne wanted to know specifically if any of this friction between parent and child were sexual.  Sexton’s mother confirmed that her father could be somewhat crude with her.  For example, she told of how Anne, then seventeen, was about to leave the house for a date dressed in a sweater blouse and skirt, when her father asked her, “Are you planning to get laid?”**  Sexton had told the same tale to Orne shortly before.

Sexton’s friends had different opinions as to whether or not her father actually molested her.  One close friend, a psychiatric social worker named Lois Ames, stated with confidence “I could never believe anything but that Anne was a victim of child sexual abuse by both Nana and her father  [emphasis original].   Maxine Kumin, however, disagreed, characterizing the notion as more of a “dramatization,” similar to other “truth crimes” she had told to Dr. Orne in therapy.   As our friend Susan wrote in an earlier post in this series:
Anne strikes me as someone who didn't live in her body much, so she acted out in order to feel something--irresponsible sexuality and self abuse made her come back into her body for a while--she lived more in her head.

Or as Dr. Diane Middlebrook wrote:
“…once she had put a memory into words, the words were what she remembered.  Thus she could give dramatic reality to a feeling by letting it generate a scene and putting that scene into words for Dr. Orne while in a trance.”
In other words, this premise hypothesizes that Sexton created fictional characters (similar to Elizabeth) based on herself.  This gave them a verisimilitude, but they nevertheless remained fictional characters, with fictional histories.  Because of mental illness (or poetic license?), Sexton might not have been able to distinguish her characters from herself.  Thus if she told a story of childhood sexual abuse at the hands of her father and aunt, would that have originated in fact, or fantasy?

Sexton herself seemed to question the actuality of the memory, but seemed quite certain that it was, at least, based on some real aspect of her relationship to her father:
Sexton:  I couldn’t make all this up, or I don’t exist at all!  Or do I make up a trauma to go with my symptoms?

Orne:  There wasn’t a simple cause; it’s something that happened many times without its necessarily happening just this way.  When your father was drinking he was communicating something to you.

Sexton:  Disgust.

Orne:  Or attraction.

Sexton:  Sitting beside Daddy, his saying I can’t eat when she’s at the dinner table--I thought pimples were a sign of things inside that were showing.

Orne:  Your feelings about him?
The tapes Dr. Orne submitted to Dr. Middlebrook gave every indication that he thoroughly believed the story at face value at that time.  He acted as if the allegation were true, prompting him to explain to Middlebrook:
I dealt with it in therapy as a real event, because there were times that it was real to her.  Anne, like most patients with this kind of disorder, easily adopted pseudo-memories in treatment which are experienced with great vividness, and their treatment may help the patient even though the events may never have occurred.  If you ask me either as a psychiatrist or as a scientist, however, I would have to say I am virtually certain that it never occurred.  It’s not plausible the way she described it, and it wasn’t the father’s style when he was drinking.  But it fit her feelings about her father having abused her, and since she sexualized everything, it would become the metaphor with which she would deal with it.

Whether or not the sexual abuse actually occurred, one could say that this psychiatric disclosure might have indicated something more pertinent to Sexton’s sexuality.  During the writing of Anne Sexton, Linda Gray Sexton told Dr. Middlebrook that Anne sexually abused her.   Linda gave further details about this in her 1994 memoir, Searching for Mercy Street:  My Journey Back to My Mother, Anne Sexton, in which she frankly discussed such things as very intimate bedtime touching (similar to what Nana supposedly did to her mother), and Anne’s tendency to masturbate in front of her.

Personally, I don’t like to take anything at face value, and am loath to state something as fact based on a single source--unless the source happens to be me.  At the same time, I’m in no position to question Linda Sexton’s memory or account of these incidents.  And what she says does make sense in a way.  If her mother had been sexually abused as a child, then that could conceivably put her at greater risk for sexually abusing her own kid. 

This incestuous behavior allegedly began shortly after Dr. Orne left the Boston area to teach at the University of Pennsylvania, thus making him unable to continue as Sexton’s main shrink.  Although the timing might make his leaving seem like a causal factor, this could have been due to the fact that Linda had just begun her adolescence, and was consequently developing into maturity.  At the same time, however, even though he was no longer her psychiatrist, Dr. Orne continued to see Sexton once a month for several years, and maintained contact with her until 1973, about a year before her suicide.  One thus has to wonder how he reacted when she disclosed this to him, or if she disclosed it to him at all. 

_____________________
*It’s also used, in combination with other drugs, to kill condemned prisoners during lethal injection.

**The wording is that of Sexton’s mother.  Sexton herself remembered the question as “Are you planning to get fucked?”

Labels: , ,

19 Comments:

  • At 9:48 AM, Blogger Charles Gramlich said…

    That opening poem is certainly powerful and disturbing. Horrifying really.

     
  • At 10:27 AM, Blogger dr.alistair said…

    sexually disfunctional parents could account for everything right there.

     
  • At 2:23 PM, Blogger X. Dell said…

    Charles, I've had the thrill of reading a good deal of Sexton's poetry over the last few months. Many of her works deliver a knockout punch--almost as if you can't believe that you're reading it. It gives her a very pointed sense of humor, which I thoroughly enjoy. But poems like this one aren't fun to read. They're very painful.

    Alistair, it would make sense.

     
  • At 12:56 PM, Blogger Susan said…

    Oh, good--another post!

     
  • At 1:06 PM, Blogger Susan said…

    My thoughts for what they are worth: I don't think her father physically molested her, but sexual talk around a child can also connote sexual abuse. He seemed like a repressed type who feared his daughter's sexuality.

    I think Anne had fantasies about her father and felt very guilty about them. Something in his speech and actions fueled some sexual charge, possibly between both. But I don't think he actually touched her.

    I do believe Linda Sexton. And it is conceivable that Anne acted on her fantasy as she was more determined to act on her wishes when Linda was growing up.

    This is my gut speaking; I remember thinking it when I read her poetry, when I read the two biographies and I still think it now. Much of her poetry paints things as she wants them to be--like a drama queen. And for Anne, a wish can also be a reality; it seemed like her mind had trouble distinguishing between the two.

     
  • At 1:28 PM, Blogger X. Dell said…

    Right, Susan. That's why I quoted you here. This is exactly the kind of problem that will play a role in Orne's later work. Here, he described these notions as fantasies. Anne herself hinted that some stories were real, some were "truth crimes." Orne dismissed these as fantasies, even though he concedes that he dealt with them as if they were real.

    I understand where you and Kumin and Orne are coming from with this. I wouldn't argue against your point of you so much as to point out that the basis of arguing against the reality of the situation is her tendency to dramatize, or story-tell. Then again, is that to say that schizophrenics (or even compulsive liars) are never abused, or never speak about anything accurately?

    My point is this: I don't know if it happened or not. I don't even have a guess or hypothesis. But if Sexton spun this tale out of wholecloth, does she actually believe it? And if she believes it, does she actually remember it happening?

    I'd say "no" to both. She's very conscious, for example, that she lied about getting raped during summer vacation. And Orne's certain she isn't schizophrenic. Thus we have to think she knew the difference between telling it like it is and concocting a tall tale. And if that's the case, then she would have to remember the accurate events in order to know that she lied.

    The only other real possibility is that she falsely believed she was lying when she made up her "truth crimes." That could indicate a number of things (including a really bad memory, with lots of gaps). It could also mean some sort of psychotic disorder. But it could also mean that she's experiencing dissociative amnesia, brought about in large part due to extreme stress (e.g., trauma).

     
  • At 5:48 AM, Blogger dr.alistair said…

    dissociative amnesia as you say, can weave it`s self into all sorts of on again, off again memory frauds that can mess with what a patient can remember about any sort of events, traumatic or otherwise...and a truly creative person could concievably invent a whole life, if prompted.

    try remembering what you did three weeks ago thursday without referring to notes!

     
  • At 10:21 AM, Blogger Susan said…

    Good point, Dr. A. It's one reason I journal--I have an awful memory.

    X--I'm not a trained therapist: I guess I'm just using my gut and my knowledge of what I have seen and read. Agreed: schizophrenics or those suffering from psychosis could very well have suffered abuse or not.It's been my experience that schizophrenics don't necessarily lie, but speak with their own sense of reality--a code.

    But people DO lie, and some are not aware that they are doing so, because they believe the lie or need to believe the lie. And it begs that question: is it still a lie when you believe it to be true and even have memories?

    We watched The Truman Show last night and it made me think about all the lies that people construct to make their lives more ideal. I also thought of the Blade Runner replicants. Their memories were real, but they weren't their memories.

    This is a highly complex case. Maybe Orne didn't want to call them false because he would have lost Anne's trust. Maybe Anne just couldn't see her life honestly--even the most adjusted of us will do some displacement with uncomfortable information. Once an event is in the past, it no longer is true or untrue in terms of memory--it is what the mind reconstructs which may be based on truth, but rearranged--a bit like playing telephone.

     
  • At 11:11 AM, Blogger X. Dell said…

    Alistair, this is getting closer to where I'm coming from when you write, "...and a truly creative person could concievably invent a whole life, if prompted."

    Assuming Sexton had some sort of dissociative disorders, including amnesia. She creates the stories. She believes them to be true. But in that circumstance, would she actually remember the actions? Could the reality have happened, as Orne suggests here, in a way that was metaphorical or somewhat allegorical to her actual history or existence (i.e., is this a case of memory distortion)? Could it be that these "memory frauds" are resulting, as you say here, in an on-again, off-again fashion leaving behind threads that a master storyteller could conceivably weave into a character?

    This is similar to what Maxine Kumin and our friend Susan are thinking here. As I said in an earlier comment, I think it's plausible, and wouldn't dispute it.

    Susan, Alistair, I'm not really looking now at the veracity of the claims so much as I am questioning what Sexton actually remembered as opposed to believed or created out of her imagination. Whether the memories are accurate or inaccurate, if she's honestly relating what those memories are, she's not lying. If she's inaccurate, then we would have to ask why (i.e., we'd have to look for signs and causes of memory distortion).

    Now, if she is lying about this, as Susan suggests, or perhaps inventing a story to go along with her symptoms, as Sexton suggested, or if, as Dr. Alistair suggests, this on-again-off-again amnesia leaves her with fragmented memories that she interpolates or interprets along a grand narrative, then in all three cases she's not exactly remembering the story that she's telling. She could believe it. She could even come across as remembering it. But that's not the same thing as remembering--with or without notes.

    BTW, one thing I remember about three weeks ago Thursday without notes: I remember the Reds losing against the Brewers. I watched the game in total frustration (something I do quite a bit these days). So it sticks in my craw.

    You're right, I can't remember the rest of the day. Too mundane. But then again, what Sexton's talking about here aren't exactly mundane events.

    Susan, in The Truman Show, the title character didn't create a series of lies to make his life ideal. Rather a corporation created a series of lies in order to exploit the main character, and him alone. In this case, the person lying isn't taken in by his own deception. He's also not gaining social prestige by hiding the lie, nor losing it by disclosing the lie, since everyone in the world (literally) knows that he is lying. That's the point of The Truman Show.

    As for Blade Runner, well that's science fiction. These are sentient androids whose thoughts don't necessarily reflect our technology or understanding of how the brain works.

    Obviously, the androids were metaphors for African Americans in an allegory to talk about race and class privledge in a non-threatening way. If we take the story at its allegorical reality, then the adroids memories would really have been their own--it's just that the ruling class would prefer not to have acknowledged it.

     
  • At 11:34 AM, Blogger dr.alistair said…

    mundane is the clue. mundane doesn`t anchor well to our neuro-chemical programming device. only the exciting and stimulating does.

    i use techniques in my work to create new "memories" for people by amplifying arousal states such as the memory of a roller-coaster ride, or jumping off a high diving board and anchoring that to whatever thing a person wants to achieve in their life, and this is an extremely powerful tool for motivating people out of "stuck" phases.

    melding the feeling of diving off a cliff (if you get off on that sort of thing) to making sales calls really drives the adrenalin and will make a person make sales calls more intensely, i assure you!

    maybe in sexton`s depressed, hum-drum existance, she was trying to anchor exciting things together to prop her up and make her go. whereas we have a cup of coffee, she needed to write porn or make up (or re-live) horrid experiences from her past.

    i have heard it said that, for most women, gossip is better than sex...and while i don`t know if that`s true or not, i could see it...especially if the gossipper is a good story-teller.

    and if you imagine a lemon long enough and clearly enough you will salivate...especially if you bite down into that soft bitter flesh.

     
  • At 10:37 PM, Blogger Ray Palm said…

    Blade Runner? That's one way of bringing Philip K. Dick into a discussion of reality, true memories, ultimate truth, etc. Besides Blade Runner (based on Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?), Hollywood also screwed up another Dick work, We Can Remember It for You Wholesale, with the movie Total Recall. Of course, Hollywood dickheads usually disappoint Dickheads.

    (The only movie to get Dicksian metaphysics right -- even though it wasn't based on a Dick novel -- was The Matrix.)

    I find some interesting parallels between Dick and Sexton. Before he died Dick thought he was in contact with some sort of godlike intelligence. What his imagination created could take on its own reality, an aspect which might have been part of the problem for Sexton with her own creative mind. Dick lied about being a heroin addict so that he could get into a certain rehab program. As with Sexton there were still areas that were either true or false.

    But what makes Dick's writing so fascinating are the gray areas. In Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? the hero encounters a police department staffed by androids. So if no one suspects the android policemen, does that mean that police department isn't a real one?

    I could see Anne Sexton as a character in one of Philip K. Dick's mind-benders.

     
  • At 6:27 AM, Blogger Susan said…

    I wasn't making a parallel with The Truman Show character as he saw his life as real and had no reason to question it until the seed was planted.

    I think I see what you are getting at--did Anne consciously create these stories and pass them off as reality, even in therapy. Well, that would be quite the method acting performance. I could see her doing that--I do see what you are getting at.

    Now to me, science fiction is the richest form of analogy to our socio-relational problems. But that is a whole different topic.

     
  • At 12:28 PM, Blogger X. Dell said…

    Alistair, it's not that we forget the mundane, but rather it all melds together in a collective memory. I don't have amnesia about making French toast recently, but I know that I have done so many times before, and recount incidents where things turned out better or worse than I had hoped. Couldn't give details. It blends together.

    Sounds to me that what you're doing isn't so much creating a new memory as creating new associations with that memory. We all have memories of something that gave us fun, joy or excitement. No one would doubt, for example, that I'm roller-coaster junkie, for example, because it would give me a thrill. While I can imagine that people can get a thrill out of unpleasant memories (masochism exists, after all), then are we still talking about a true memory as opposed to a belief, or interpretation of memory based on, as you imply earlier, fragments of memory.

    Ray, Hollywood's screwed up pretty much all of Dick's stories, slavishly trying to incorporate "action" and chills into narratives that are, by their nature fairly lighthearted and whimsical (one of my favorite aspects of his writing) in tone.

    Now that you mention it, the similarities between Sexton and Dick do strike me as kinda interesting, though.

    Susan, I think I understand now. If we cast Sexton onto that scenario, of course, then we have an even wilder story to tell.

    In anticipating where I'm going, you're correct in assessing my position. If she's lying, or inventing a story, she's not really remembering anything. If she isn't lying--i.e., if she believes that what she's saying is the truth--then that's a whole other issue. Sexton being Sexton, I don't think that anyone (including Orne) was 100% certain (maybe 99.44%) whether this was an accurate depiction of the past, or a deliberate tale on Sexton's part. In 1991, Orne said that he interpreted the statements as fantasy. At the time, he treated them as though they were accurate and based on her actual memory.

     
  • At 8:16 AM, Blogger Candy Minx said…

    I believe that the layers of lying, the behaviour of her father and Sexton's confusion about lying, truth all indicate some kind of childhood abuse. I think her father coming into her room and saying any of those things is sexual abuse....if he said any of those things...then I believe he did rape her.

    It's difficult to tell though if this is a person who knew what was trendy and taboo during this time in her life and she hoped it would help her act like Sylvia Plath and be a better poet. If she was a socciopath and just wanted fame and "authenticity" and faked all this to make poems...well...that is sick in itself.

    It sounds to me that her whole state is a result of spiritual and emotional bankruptcy from her family...and very similar to what we see coming from young people in the next ten or twenty years...manifested with hippes, counterculture and rejecting those family dysifunctions reflected in the poets of the 1950's.

    I think this is like a long stream of Healing within the United States...where the contemporary collapse of civilization is most manifested.

    To think of the kind of popular information that people have at their hands right now...compared with the mystique that Sexton had...we have Oprah, Dr Phil, Dr Drew, tons of magazines and books with self-help...

    I think it's interesting to see the kind of turmnoil and disease here in these poems, abuse, imagined abuse....but reflecting the truth of a corrupt family problem in society.

    Two thoughts...random, but oen of my film profs who I greatly admired would work on an argument in his critiques , Robin Wood, that the two driving forces in North America are patriarchy and capitalism. And those two forces corrupt relationships.

    And then this essay which I am sure I've shared with you before? Maybe maybe not...I think during your Manson writings?

    I think it's a must read and tremedous resource...

    http://www.bu.edu/arion/files/2010/03/paglia_cults-1.pdf

     
  • At 2:02 PM, Blogger dr.alistair said…

    well, railing against partriarcy and capitalism is most of what not/ok children do, one way or another.

     
  • At 5:34 AM, Blogger Chris Benjamin said…

    murky murky murky.

     
  • At 9:03 PM, Blogger The Lady Prism said…

    To be born in a world of advantage yet, to be living a life of utter misery - what a tragedy.

    --------------

    "and the baby on the platter,
    cooked but still human,
    cooked also with little maggots,
    sewn onto it maybe by somebody's mother,
    the damn bitch!"

    ~ live or die

     
  • At 11:32 AM, Blogger dr.alistair said…

    "and the baby on the platter,
    cooked but still human,
    cooked also with little maggots,
    sewn onto it maybe by somebody's mother,
    the damn bitch!"

    this reminds me of my sister railing against my mother and her persistant repeating of all the cruel things mother said to her growing up.


    i guess i`ve learned to not tolerate people who can`t be civil, and still need to be validated.

     
  • At 7:48 PM, Blogger X. Dell said…

    Candy, thanks for the link. I'm not a huge fan of Paglia's, but it's important to get differing points of view, especially when they occasionally intersect with one's own.

    I'm not sure that Sexton had enough savvy to keenly see the forces of capitalism shaping her life, especially since they are responsible for affording the privilege that she grew up with.

    Patriarchy, on the other hand, is something that she's very aware of. In a way, she's attempting to kowtow to it, and finding it difficult because of the sacrifice it demands of her (sublimation of ambition, etc.). One can also see it as a common theme to a good deal of her poetry, and subverting that dominion seemed to be a common theme in her life (hence her father-in-law's belief that she was playing everyone "for suckers").

    Benjibopper, 'tis murky indeed. It's one of those questions that really cannot be answered, and one could answer that it shouldn't.

    Lady Prism, welcome back. Sorry that I didn't answer you promptly, but I've been away from cyberspace whilst recouperating from a bug.

    There is a certain irony in those who have a lot feeling so empty. Then again, it makes sense. If you cannot want for anything, then desire--no matter how illicit, or dangerous (or fattening for that matter)--comes at a premium. Then, one day, kicks no longer do it for you.

    Alistair, it's been my experience that uncivil people are most desperate in seeking validation.

    You write, "well, railing against partriarcy and capitalism is most of what not/ok children do, one way or another."

    I guess that's true if patriarchy and capitalism played a material role in making them not/ok.

     

Post a Comment

<< Home

Ganesh Map
Click to know more Episode 1Episode 2Episode 3Episode 4Episode 5Episode 6Episode 7Episode 8Episode 9Episode 10Episode 11Episode 12Episode 13Episode 14Episode 15Episode 16
  • Alien Abductions
  • April Fool's Day
  • Mae Brussell
  • Cause-Stalking
  • The Children of God Cult
  • Sam Cooke
  • Culture Jamming
  • Exploitation Movies
  • Fox, Monsanto and Mystery Milk
  • Games
  • The Gemstone File
  • Gik-Gik
  • The Golden Ganesh (History)
  • The Golden Ganesh (The Radio Drama)
  • The Gulf Breeze UFOs
  • The Grail Mystery
  • Jimi Hendrix
  • Hitlerism vs. Nazism
  • The International Church of Christ
  • Janis Joplin
  • Legends, Hoaxes and the Big Lie
  • Lyndon LaRouche and Jeremiah Duggan
  • John Lennon
  • Marilyn Monroe
  • McMartin Preschool
  • MJ-12
  • Nurse Nayirah
  • Ode to Miss Texas
  • Operational Finance
  • The Paul-Is-Dead Rumor
  • Perverse Science: Biological Determinism
  • Project MK-ULTRA
  • Ruminations on the JFK Assassination
  • Anne Sexton
  • The Summer of 1947
  • The Tate-LaBianca-Hinman-Parent-Hinman-Shea Murders
  • The Symbionese Liberation Army (SLA)
  • Urban Legends
  • The VENONA Ciphers and the Rosenbergs
  • Watergate
  • 9/11
  • Assassinations
  • Chappaquiddick
  • Cults
  • Cyberculture
  • Domestic ops
  • Esoterica
  • Espionage
  • Fiction
  • Games
  • The Golden Ganesh (history)
  • Humor
  • Mafia
  • Media
  • Mind control
  • Nanis
  • New World Order
  • Operation CHAOS
  • Paranoia
  • Parapsychology
  • Personal stuff
  • Political theory
  • Pop Culture
  • Psychology
  • Shameless Plug Division
  • Ufology
  • Weird Science

  • ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------s