Tuesday, October 03, 2006

Kill the Music: Red, Red Wine

This post was edited for accuracy on October 5, 2006.

The official story of Jimi Hendrix’s death originates largely in the accounts given by Monika Dannemann to the press, the police, and the coroner. Yet, other, apparently credible witnesses give a story so conflicting as to the accounts of Hendrix’s final minutes of life, that both versions completely negate each other. They simply cannot both be true in any regard. Either one is completely false, or they are both completely false.


Dannemann’s Version/The Official Version

Hendrix and Dannemann attend a party on the afternoon of September 17, 1970, where they sipped wine, ate a vegetarian rice dish, and mingled with guests. Afterward, they repaired to the Samarkand Hotel, where Dannemann lived in a rather dingy basement apartment, instead of the more comfortable Cumberland Hotel where Hendrix had already paid for a room.

At approximately 11:00pm Hendrix received a call to meet persons unknown to Dannemann (and consequently to history). Hendrix somehow anticipated the call, and it made him quite anxious. Already coming down from an acid trip, he became extremely frightened, and upset. At around 10:30pm, he telephoned Chas Chandler, but could not reach him. So he left an agitated, but incoherent message on Chandler’s answering machine. In an effort to calm down, he then took a street tranquilizer known as a “black bomber” moments before a car arrived and took him away to who knows where.

Hendrix returned to the Samarkand at 3:00am on the morning of September 18. Still wound up, and hungry, Dannemann fixed him a tuna fish sandwich, and they talked on the bed until she fell asleep at approximately 6:00am. She awoke about four hours later, and went to the kitchen to smoke two cigarettes, before heading out to the store to buy another pack.

When she returned, at about 10:30am, Dannemann checked in on Hendrix and noticed that he had taken two of her Vesperax. Here, Hendrix might have been a victim of cross-cultural misunderstanding. In the US, one often takes such medications in doses of two. Vesperax, however, was extremely potent. The recommended dosage required the user to break a single tablet into four parts, then take a quarter of it. In other words, Hendrix had unwittingly swallowed eight doses. Still, this was nowhere close to fatal.

When Dannemann looked closer, she could see “sick” on the tip of his nose, yet, he was breathing normally, and his pulse matched hers. She called Eric Burdon to ask for advice, around 11:00am. Burdon told her that Hendrix was probably just tired, and that she should let him sleep. An hour later, she called again when repeated efforts to wake him proved futile. Burdon then told her to call an ambulance.

Paramedics revived Hendrix, and sat him in a chair. Dannemann watched as Jimi repeated tried to bend his head over to vomit. But the attendants kept pushing his head up, thus causing him to swallow what he could. Everything else went down his windpipe. Ultimately, they decided to strap him into the chair so that he couldn’t move his head at all, and it is at this point where he drowned.

Dannemann rode with Hendrix via ambulance to St. Mary Abbot’s Hospital. When she arrived hospital staff kept her from accompanying Hendrix to the emergency room—that was because, she believed, the nurses and physician on duty disapproved of interracial relationships. She caused quite a commotion arguing her case, but to no avail. A doctor came out about an hour later and told her that Hendrix had died.

Dr. Gavin Thurston, the coroner who conducted the official inquest the following week, declared that Hendrix had drowned on his own vomit because his gag reflex had been suppressed by a mild overdose of Vesperax. While that might have explained (if true) how Hendrix died, Thurston declined to answer any questions of why he died, and thus issued an open verdict in the case. In other words, the coroner never ruled out the possibilities of accidental overdose, suicide, or murder.


Reginald Jones, John Saua, and Dr. John Bannister’s Version

Paramedics Reginald Jones and John Saua got a call at about 11:15:am to report to Dannemann’s basement flat. They arrived precisely at 11:27am, only to find Hendrix’s body lying in a pool of vomit and red liquid in an empty apartment. Although they knew he was long dead, they did not have the credentials to declare him thus. So they did the standard procedures given to them by training, and called police for permission to transport the fallen rock star to St. Mary Abbot’s Hospital, where ER physician Dr. John Bannister worked on him for an hour before officially declaring him dead.

Although Dr. Bannister issued the statement of death at about the time that the official version declared Hendrix dead, the state of the body—the temperature, the discoloration of his mouth and mucous membranes, etc.—told him that Hendrix had died much earlier, approximately 3:00am that morning.
Jimi Hendrix had been dead for some time, without a doubt, hours rather than minutes. He didn't have any pulse. The inside of his mouth and mucous membranes were black because he had been dead for some time. He had had no circulation through his tissues at any time immediately prior to coming to hospital…


Dr. Bannister, Jones and Saua flatly contradict the bulk of the official story. Hendrix, they said, was not alive when the ambulance arrived. Dannemann was nowhere to be found. Furthermore, while Dannemann said Hendrix had eaten a tuna fish sandwich shortly before his death, the only foodstuff that Dr. Banister could pull out of Jimi was a copious amount of yellow rice.

The most important contradiction, however, is the cause of death. Dr. Thurston, the coroner, said Hendrix drowned in his own vomit. Dr. Bannister, the physician actively attending Hendrix said that the guitarist died from drowning, all right, but not in vomit. According to Bannister, Hendrix drowned in red wine:

[Red wine] was coming out of his nose and out of his mouth. It was horrific. The whole scene is very vivid, because you don't often see people who have drowned in their own red wine. There was red wine all over him, I think that he was naked but he had something around him—whether it was a towel or a jumper—around his neck. That was saturated in red wine. His hair was matted…The medical staff used an 18 inch metal sucker to try to clear Hendrix's airway, but it would just fill up with red wine from the stomach…

This is curious for a number of reasons. First of all, Hendrix didn’t like red wine. He preferred white. While it’s possible he might have had a glass or two for social reasons, we still have to wonder why Hendrix would willingly drink enough of the stuff to drown in it. Furthermore, Dr. Bannister’s blood alcohol test showed that Hendrix was only slightly above the legal limit. Had he simply been drinking red wine in that quantity, Hendrix’s blood alcohol level should have been much higher.

If true, Dr. Bannister’s steadfast insistence on this cause of death can only mean that someone forced red wine down Hendrix’s throat. So if we go with the observations of the doctor who actually attended Jimi as patient, then we can come to only one conclusion about his death: murder.

To read earlier posts in this series, click here.

25 comments:

  1. I've got some catching up to do on your blog...
    everytime i sit down and want to peruse it with leisure i get interrupted. might have to do the lux thing and print it out.
    see ya later and i hope you had a good visit with cora.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Getting interrupted seems to be an occupational hazard of parenthood, meine freundin:-)

    And yes, I enjoyed Cora and son's trip to the Big Apple very much. I'll post about it after this series, but Mayden's Voyage will have beaten me in discussing our "adventures" in Manhattan.

    ReplyDelete
  3. A paradox indeed, but I am soo enjoying your Kill the Music posts.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Assuming that the paramedics and the doctor were “3rd party” unbiased unwitting participants, one would have to think of some grandiose reason why they would lie. Given that and they were not personally involved, one would think they would be the more likely party to believe as truthful. Also, given their version, whoever was responsible for killing Hendrix would logically tend to desire Dannemann’s story to be official, so as to throw off suspicion. So, believing that someone would coerce the paramedics and doctor into telling another account pointing to murder seems absurd. There must be more to this story though…

    ReplyDelete
  5. Happy to hear that, Sunny. Hope you like the next one too.

    John, you have put your finger on the very issue that's at stake. The versions hinge on the credibility of Dannemann vs. that of Jones, Saua and Bannister. Obviously, the medics version is weightier, since we would presume that they were unbias (we have no reason not to).

    Dannemann is far more complicated. Some aspects of her seem credible, others do not--and those that aren't credible could easily be seen as an attempt to discredit her with false or deceptive statemnts, many made years after her death--which, like Hendrix's is surrounded by mystery and controversy.

    ReplyDelete
  6. yeeeeeah!...I'm doing the lux thing myself and print this out!!..Will read it when I get home..in about...15 minutes!..

    Hi there X!!..am' looking forward to your post about zee' Mayden adventures!..

    ReplyDelete
  7. I am with Lux here!

    Tell us about your experience meeting a fellow blogger! What was the highlight for you of the weekend and what would you have changed if you could have?
    Was it odd/strange? Comfortable from the start? What you expected? Ok I am totally being a girl here with all these questions! lol

    I am sorry to say that my fall trip to NYC looks like it is off. I am trying to work a trip up near Christmas. We'll see! I love the city in the fall though! It is just perfect. Winter is a bit dicey...

    Anyway...

    Happy Thursday!

    ReplyDelete
  8. I know this is a technicality but if Hendrix was in an advanced state of rigor when he arrived at the hospital...why did Bannister work on him for an hour before declaring him dead? It's typical to exhaust all means of revival before declaring someone dead but if he was in rigor...wouldn't the effort have been futile?

    ReplyDelete
  9. I'll definitely talk about the visit, Lux. But I will relive it for awhile on Mayden's page.

    Same to you, Kate. Sorry you can't visit the Apple during its nicest season (IMHO--others like NY in June, how about you?).

    As far as the comfort level, or oddity, the novelty passed after about a nanosecond, and I felt completely comfortable around Cora and Tim. She was just as I imagined, and pretty much the person you see in her blog. I was most pleasantly surprsed by Tim, whom I like a lot. He's a fine young man.

    Angie, there's a reason why the resucitation attempt doesn't make any sense, and that's because I screwed up something and you caught it. I got that particular bit of information from a source I thought was dicey, and hoped to confirm it later--and if not simply delete it (which I will now). I simply got sloppy and didn't edit as closely as I should.

    Otherwise, the lack of pulse and heartbeat, and the blackening of the mucus membranes are quite true to Dr. Bannister's version--and thus your question remains a valid one. Why work for 45 minutes on someone who's clearly dead, as Jones, Saua, and Bannister all attested to?

    Maybe they thought they could save a lost cause. That would be something to investigate, although maybe the answer is that they were simply going through the motions just in case. Maybe they were simply dedicated professionals who wanted to give the victim every chance possible to survive.

    But you're right in assuming that the effort they exerted indicated that Hendrix's status was not as decided as they otherwise depict.

    ReplyDelete
  10. really really odd..
    the doctor's and the paramedic's version does seem weightier.
    ...oh, the intrigue..

    ReplyDelete
  11. X, I didn't mean for you to re-write the post. It seemed odd to spend time reviving someone when rigor has set in but it could have just been an effort to make sure they did everything by the book given who the patient was. Of course, if Hendrix was alive when he entered the hospital....

    ReplyDelete
  12. Yes, Schaumi, it is intriguing. But what would your husband say?

    I didn't rewrite the post, Angie. I simply deleted something tht I had thought I already deleted because I couldn't confirm it.

    That being the case, your question is still a valid one--especially since, as Dr. Bannister disclosed in 1992, he was NOT aware that Hendrix was a celebrity. In other words, he went through extraordinary procedures to try to resucitate someone who, for as far as he knew (or claimed to know) simply came in off the street as a nobody.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Hmmmm...many things don't add up here- I'm still reading and chewing on all of it.

    About our meeting- I was a little nervous right before we met, and within seconds of our greeting- I was at ease. It was kind of like meeting a cousin who'd been a pen-pal for a long time.
    I've posted the rest of the NY photos- or at least all that I'm going to post for a while.

    Now- back to Hendrix- I'll re-read the last 2 posts again tomorrow :)

    ReplyDelete
  14. /bark bark bark

    i think think of plenty of reasons why a rock stars girlfriend would off him. red wine. a terrible way to go.

    /grrr

    ReplyDelete
  15. Mayden, I've seen some of the NYC pics (others aren't showing up in my browser for some reason). Seems like we had pretty much the same feeling.

    As for Hendrix, that's kinda the point. Things don't add up. Dr. Bannister said that he knew that Hendrix was the patient in question because of Jones and Saua's presence, AND because he rarely got black patients--maybe two or three a year.

    So, for the past six years, I've been wondering if there was a second corpse--one that would answer the question of why Dannemann's and Jones' accounts differ so wildly, but open up mfar more questions in return.

    I agree, K9 that red wine would have been a terrible way to go--namely because of the violence involved in forcing someone's mouth open and restraining them to pour down the liquid. While many (like you) suspect Dannemann, one would have to figure she got some kind of help to do this, for it's doubtful that she could have done it alone.

    ReplyDelete
  16. hey, x!
    i haaven't been here for awhile, so i need to read & catch up, but i wanted to tell you i'm still here!!

    ReplyDelete
  17. Always happy to see you, fellow Buckeye.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Hey gorgeous. I'm not in the ground yet. Droppin' by to show you some love xox Tragic*

    ReplyDelete
  19. I watched 2 documentaries yesterday- one about Janice Joplin and the other about Cass Elliot.
    Wow. So much of what you've posted made more sense to me afterwards- because I had a better feel for the era after watching their performances, listening to their interviews, and hearing what family and friends had to say about them.
    I wish I could see one now about Jimi.
    I heard Janice sing- she could carry a tune, but when she starts in with the edgy, whiny, gritty singing- she loses me. I didn't like it at all.
    It seemed that people liked her because she was different- and she seemed to be in a fair amount of emotional pain...and I think that her expressing herself from that pain was taboo at the time.

    Jimi, on the other hand, had a gift-a real talent. I'll be watching the Biography channel for a Hendrix bio- and if you hear of one- please let me know.
    Hope all is well with you :)

    ReplyDelete
  20. i don't think anything remotely suspicious happened to hendrix. i think this was a matter of gross incompetence on the part of the ambulance crew. in those days uk ambulance crews were inept at treating sick people, ceratinly in england. they were not medics but rather glorified 'bus drivers'. i know. i spent several years in british hospitals often being taken there by ambulance crews. nice people. good people but fucking useless at giving medical aid. nowadays we have medics who do the same job and can administer help but then they didn't and couldn't.
    another thing that time seems to have dimmed is the fact that hendrix was no longer the popular figure that he had been during 66 & 67. here, three years later, he was trying to resurect his failing career. to the genearl public and many of the music bigwigs he had past his best.
    anyway, all of that to one side, the man was a genius and gave birth to so many bands and legends all of whom owe him a huge debt.

    ReplyDelete
  21. hope you had a good weekend.
    still haven't sent hubbie your link.
    interesting to read a comment by somebody who had actually been treated by medics in England. But having so much red wine in you that you drown in it still gives me a creepy feeling.
    after you get to the blitheringly idiotitly (sp)drunken stage you practically need help to keep on drinking. Then you pass out and probably need more "help" to keep on drinking.
    anyway, i'm off to work in just a few minutes...
    cya

    ReplyDelete
  22. Good to see you Tragic one. I hope to write to you soon to see how you're doing. And remember, love always comes back to you.

    Cora, the reason why I've taken a long amount of time with this series is precisely because it's hard to digest. There are conflicting reports from just about everywhere as to what actually happened, and it's damn near difficult to rule out anything.

    As to your visit, I have to say that upon saying hello I felt quite comfortable with you--as if I had known you for years. I felt the same way about Tim, and trust me I can't stop saying good things about him. I see a lot of kids his age, and many of them are pretentious and conformist. Tim's down to Earth, and seem comfortable in his own skin. That says a lot about his character, and about his parents' character. You are both truly blessed with each other.

    CJ, first of all, thanks greatly for the 411 vis-a-vis the state of UK paramedics in the early-1970s. Saua and Jones are not beyond question, obviously.

    While it's logical to conclude that Hendrix's star was on the decline in the UK in 1970, one has to remember that he headlined Woodstock in 1969, and played to sold-out audiences in Sweeden and Germany the month of his death. Furthermore, his last album had not yet been completed, and could have possibly renewed interest in him in the UK (after all, the Beatles underwent two down periods in the UK before breaking up).

    I appreciate your observations about the paramedics, and will defer to your opinion about them, for in that light, one could conclude that they simply were at a loss at what to do, and therefore decided to say that he was dead already so that they wouldn't have to do much for them. That would further explain why Dr. Bannister worked for at least 45 minutes in an effort to resucitate Hendrix.

    At the same time, however, I would have to think that Dr. Bannister's corroboration would have to have some merit. After all, I'm only a lay person, but I can tell the difference between red wine and vomit, or between white rice and tuna fish. Surely, England's physicians couldn't be so incompetent to mistake wine for vomit, especially if (as Bannister states) the wine had matted his hair and clothing.

    I will also have to respectfully disagree about something else. If for no other reason, the fact that the corner's official finding differs so wildly from that of the doctor attending Hendrix raises legitimate suspicion. They cannot both be correct. Moreover, Dr. Bannister's examination could only lead to one cause of death: murder. Couple that with the fact that others warned Jimi that he would be murdered if he fired Jeffrey again, and that Jimi fired Jeffrey again anyway two days before he died, one has cause to ask legitimate questions about his death, and probe it further.

    Schaumi, meine freundin, we've already had this conversation in another language, as I recall. I used to be a fair man with the bottle myself, but I could never imagine drinking so much of anything (even water) that it would fill my lungs, my internal organs to the rate that it could be sucked out of my body by a machine for that length of time.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Exiles8006:25 PM

    What is interesting here is Hendrix was obviously drowned in wine which is otherwise known as "Waterboarding". The reason this is condemning is the only people who waterboard are intelligence agencies. Since Jeffery was MI5 what that tells you is Hendrix was murdered by Jeffery as he allegedly confessed. You can only speculate whether the "old London colleagues," Jeffery told Wright he used to help murder Hendrix, were indeed old MI5 friends who would be inclined towards that kind of thing?

    It gets even creepier if you study the Bahamian offshore tax shelter banks Jeffery had deposited Hendrix's stolen money into. Those banks were at the crossroads of a very dubious relationship between the CIA and syndicated crime. Our American CIA had an agreement between our mob and themselves to allow the mob control of the Caribbean in return for suppressing another Cuba. CIA looked the other way and took a cut of the proceeds which it used to finance dirty operations outside of government scrutiny. The very BCCI bank Jeffery used was indeed the bank used to store those funds. So when Hendrix threatened to expose Jeffery's pilfering in court he threatened court scrutiny of those banks which would have threatened much more than just Jeffery.

    There's absolutely no doubt Jimi Hendrix was waterboarded to death. You simply can't have that much wine in your lungs with such a minimal blood alcohol content without it being waterboarding. Plus there was pure, uningested wine on the bed and clothes as well as in his hair - which was spilled there in the act of waterboarding. Waterboarding was a purely intelligence agency technique unknown at the time which this particular form was meant to look like a fatal combination of barbiturates and alcohol. And that's why they thought they would get away with it (and did).

    Dannemann had to be involved because the coroner found undigested rice in Hendrix's stomach. Since it takes about 4 hours for the stomach to clear its contents, and Hendrix was witnessed eating that rice between 11pm and midnight, that means Hendrix died somewhere between his arrival at Dannemann's flat at 3am and 4am. This fits the murder scenario perfectly as well as Doctor Bannister's estimated time of death.

    What needs to be done here is someone with some money needs to sue the British Government for obstruction of justice in the matter of evidence for murder. Also for incompetence and malpractice in the Inquest and failure to detect murder. Governments, of course, are expert organizations at wearing down the opposition with unlimited delays and costs.

    Jeffery either murdered Hendrix because he was in debt to the mafia over his Hendrix business dealings or as part of a CIA COINTELPRO operation where this subterfuge and mob compromise was deliberately imposed on Hendrix as a pretext for political assassination.

    We all know who the ones who waterboard are after all don't we?

    ReplyDelete
  24. Exiles8002:14 PM

    If Tappy Wright did run collection for Jeffery some of that money might have been Hendrix proceeds but some of it might have been CIA underground money from Europe. If you read Michael Collins Piper the CIA also had a deal with European mobs to control communism. The Marseilles "French Connection" heroin cartel was allowed by CIA and European Intelligence as part of this deal. Some of that money might have been Jeffery's Hendrix proceeds but some might have been heroin/mafia kickbacks going to the Bahamian fund. It would make sense that Jeffery, being MI-5, and being directly involved with the mafia would be a prime candidate for being a facilitator. Not only that he had the cover of the money being Hendrix money if he ever got caught. But he never would get caught and never did, and I think we know the reason why. You can see the fingerprint on this is exactly how CIA would do it. Watch the movie 'French Connection'. The narration at the end complains that nothing was really done to the main players and they got away (you think maybe the movie's maker was fully aware of why they let the main players get away?) It is this filthy network in which Jimi found himself, with his main go-between being Michael Jeffery. The CIA very much did imitate the pattern of their drug smuggler cooperators. Jeffery had the perfect cover of running around with lots of Hendrix cash. He was the perfect profile for CIA drug nexus secret black ops funding facilitator.

    If Jeffery was feeding the CIA secret fund it would be perfect for him to send Tappy Wright and Bob Levine to borrow money from the New Jersey mafia in order to embroil Hendrix in mafia debt as part of operations CHAOS and COINTELPRO. Jeffery had done this to the Animals as well - not because he was a crook as much as being an intelligence operator and part of this overall anti-communist program from the get go, right from his MI-5 service before he touched any rock bands. The Animals and Hendrix took off and became popular not because Jeffery was such a good manager but because they were designed as cover from the start for Jeffery's involvement in this program. I have no doubt CIA sought to cooperate with the mafia to tap the rock movement as a funding source. Jeffery's treatment of Jimi was nothing other than intelligence tactics.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Exiles8002:15 PM

    I think this is all starting to fall into place. I suspect Jeffery made up the part about stuffing pills down Hendrix's throat because he was trying to cover for Monika. Monika said she gave Jimi the Vesparax but they were weak so she gave him more. This matches the autopsy evidence because Hendrix had a 3.9mg barbiturate level - which means the pills had time to be ingested and absorbed by the blood. We know Jeffery's alleged claim that he stuffed pills into Hendrix followed by wine is wrong because the pills would have been vomited right back up.

    Jeffery would need to cover for Monika and make up this version because he needed to hide the fact Hendrix's murder was an intelligence assassination where Dannemann could have been a witting or unwitting accomplice. Jeffery could be partly telling the truth about "stuffing the pills down Hendrix's throat" but only in the way of setting-up those super-strong pills within Hendrix's reach as part of the operation and then springing on him after he had taken them and passed-out. You see Jeffery had to lie about the pills because once it became obvious Monika was used to get the super-strong Vesparax into Hendrix's reach it would become obvious that Jimi Hendrix was killed by an intelligence operation.

    So there's a motive here I hadn't pondered which covers the confusion over why Jeffery would confess? Being a wickedly shrewd and trained MI-5 operator Jeffery was confessing a partly false story because he feared for his own life. Jeffery wasn't stupid. He knew the CIA/intelligence pattern for this kind of thing was to then murder the covert operator who carried out the operation. In fact, that likely happened in 1973 with the mid-air plane crash no one would suspect (classic CIA). I wouldn't doubt that Jeffery's setting-up a cover story that would exonerate any intelligence agency involvement by setting-up a plausible business-related motive would be something Jeffery might think would take the heat off him from the people who really threatened him. Being an MI-5 insider who had already gotten away with it and wasn't being investigated he knew he had nothing to fear from the law, so he covered himself against the people he really did need to fear. Hence the confession. Knowing there was no proof or potential legal consequences (since MI-5 was protecting him) he knew he would never have to answer to the charges. So this red herring about murdering Jimi for the insurance money would, once again, be an intel "limited hang-out" that would steer people away from the real murderers. Jeffery knew he had nothing to fear legally. He had planted the intel information with Tappy Wright. The 'confession' was an intelligence operation. Why do you think Tappy Wright has not been interviewed or subpoena-ed by the authorities? Why do you think that to this day no one has produced any insurance policy Jeffery collected on Hendrix? Why do you think, with so much screaming evidence, Scotland Yard refuses to re-open the case?


    The picture comes into focus...

    ReplyDelete