Thursday, September 16, 2010

Legends, Hoaxes and the Big Lie: A Model Citizen

The Gulf Breeze UFO sightings grew in intensity over 1989, with over 130 reports over a six-month time from independent witnesses. This attracted national media attention. Unsolved Mysteries aired two separate pieces on Gulf Breeze, one in which Ed Walters remained anonymous, and another after he himself had come out of the closet, and written his book with Dr. Bruce Maccabee.

In this second piece, Unsolved Mysteries began to examine some of the reports that indicated Walters hoaxed his UFO photographs. The accusations of hoaxing came from several different sources: (1) local citizens who knew, or claimed to know, Walters; (2) ufologists who found credibility problems in Walters’ claims; and (3) those critical of MUFON’s handling of the case.

In 1989, the resultant publicity surrounding Walters’ photos, story and coming out of the cosmic closet drove him and Frances out of their house. They purchased a new home, and sold their old one to Robert and Sarah Menzer, a couple who had recently relocated from the Washington D.C. area. As out-of-towners, the Menzers had no clue about the reported UFO activity surrounding it, and Walters offered them no information. So, it came as a surprise to Robert when, scrounging around in the attic to find a shutoff valve, he discovered a miniature flying saucer that looked like the one in Walters’ photographs.

Since he had no idea about the UFO flap in Gulf Breeze, Menzer didn’t know what to make of his discovery until June 1990, when Pensacola journalist Craig Meyers decided to write a follow-up piece on the Walters photographs. With other leads drying up, Meyers thought it wouldn’t do any harm if he talked to the people who bought the house at the center of all the hubbub.


I came by because, as I said, this house is where Ed and Frances claimed to have taken several of those photos in 1987 and 1988. I said.. 'Well, we were just wondering if possibly you had found or seen anything unusual since you moved in?'

The Menzers were beginning to look like the couple who had bought the home in The Amityville Horror.

'Found something? Like what?' Mr. Menzer said.

'Well, first of all, what about a UFO?' I asked, only half laughing.

'No, I can’t say we have,' Mr. Menzer said, chuckling.

'Okay. What about any photographs laying around?'

'No.'

'Books about UFOs, photography, unexplained phenomenon?'

'Can’t say we have.

'Any models of UFOs…'

I was ready to write down another 'no,' but there was only silence. I looked up and they were looking at each other. Then they looked at me. My heart was once again pumping like a kettle drum.
The Menzers produced the model. Even more damning, Menzer found a sketch of a property inside it. Walters had worked on the property. Ed’s handwriting was all over it.

On 17 June 1990, a few days after the publication of Meyers’ account in the Pensacola News Journal, teenager Tommy Smith, after telling his father about pictures he helped Walters fake, stepped forward to expose the ruse. Gulf Breeze Mayor Edward Grey held a press conference two days later to pronounce Walters a fraud.

While that could have settled the question of authenticity once and for all, there were some MUFON people who saw the revelation as spurious. After some digging, they found evidence that the model, the plans, and even Tommy Smith were not what they appeared to be.

15 comments:

  1. i remember 1989 as being a very good year for me.
    i remember reading sagan's book contact around that time. but, for the world of me, i don't remember the gulf breeze ufo sightings.

    anyway ...

    it seems we have fake ufo sightings plus fake models?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Great pun in your title. I was aware of the story about the model discovery but not all the details so I'll hold commenting.

    This section in the penultimate paragraph puzzled me:

    "...teenager Tommy Smith told his father about the stepped forward to say that he had helped Walters fake UFO pics."

    Not to say that I've never written puzzling sentences on occasion.

    I've only read The Gulf Breeze Sightings. Have you read any other books or articles about the incident after that book came out? I was wondering if there was any explanation for "Zeehas." To me it implied that Ed might've been one of them or part alien.

    ReplyDelete
  3. That should've read: "...so I'll hold off commenting."

    Like I say, proofreading your own writing ain't easy.

    ReplyDelete
  4. "I'll hold off from commenting."

    There, that should do it!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Foam, yes on one, no on the other.

    Ray, thanks for spotting that. As far as your observations on self-editing: ain't that the truth?

    ReplyDelete
  6. The smoking model has spoken

    ReplyDelete
  7. i think what you have there is contraty evidence, not proof the the contrary.

    dr. bruce maccabee gave walters cameras that were designed to be able to provide eveidence of the distance fromt he camera objects were situated and also altitude.

    maccabee was confident in the photographic evidence provided.

    in the billy meier case models were found, but some we found to have been made by children asa gifts for their friend.

    for what it`s worth, i always had a suspicion that at least some of walters pictures looked like cheap double exposures, in fact there is one of his photos of the ufo report from 1990 which i have in my posession of an object proported to be resting on the road a few yards from the camera that looks suspicious to me, but i don`t know conclusively.

    fascinating topic though...

    ReplyDelete
  8. sometime the public is easily led to believe the unbelievable...

    ReplyDelete
  9. Ha! Word Verification is "wishingl"... all it needs is a "y" on the end.

    Of course, we will never know why people do these things, only the flimsy excuse at the end.

    I remember this fairly well, I was not only a fan of the Weekly World News (as a work of fictional entertainment, of course...), but also Unsolved Mysteries.

    Can't wait for you to get down to the nitty-gritty on this one.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Charles, it's said its piece.

    Dr. Alistair, there were a lot of things said about one photo in particular. I'm of the mind that some of Walters' photographs were genuine, but that most were not. When I get the enrgy to resume this series, I'll explain why.

    Sure, Libby. It's called the big lie. When you hear it over and over again, it starts to sound true, whether there's evidence for it or not.

    Eric, unfortunately, I'm working through some things in meatspace, and have had to interrupt my blogging temporarily. I hope to get back to things soon.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Another fascinating article Xdell!!
    a bit later than normal getting over here to read it---been very lazy (and not feeling quite up to par---altho much better now) this month--------I think I also read Sagan's book in 89 but i think it was published somewhat earlier----
    1989 was a fairly good year for me too---except for my 3 week stint in an alcohol treatment program-LOL
    I can't wait to read the next segment my friend---I hope you are doing great and please please-if you have any--send some cool (or cooler) weather to the Phoenix area:-)

    ReplyDelete
  12. Oh duh ---haha I missed the pun in the title at first --slowing down here---good one X!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  13. Devin, no worries. I've been delayed in posting due to issues I'm facing in meatspace. Always good to see you.

    I have to admit though that I didn't read anything of Sagan's until after I saw the movie with Jodie Foster.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Anonymous7:54 AM

    from what i read...Ed Walters moved out and the house where the photos were take were vacant for 10 months before it was purchased by the Menzers. Plenty of time to plant a fake UFO, right?

    ReplyDelete
  15. Hello, Anonymous. Welcome to the X-Spot.

    I would agree that there would have been time to plant a model in the attic. But given the other evidence that screams hoax, it's far more likely that Walters used that as either a model or a prototype model.

    ReplyDelete