Figure 1. Ed Walters Photograph 19

Walters reported the incident to MUFON, as well as what happened the following day. Apparently, a “Special Agent McKathy” from the United States Air Force visited him, and demanded the photo. Walters told him he’d already given it to a Miami Herald reporter. He then reported another incident on 16 January, which prompted a visit from MUFON founder Walter Andrus. After interviewing Walters, and looking over the photo, Andrus declared, “This is one of the most amazing UFO cases that I have investigated in the past thirty years in the United States.”
From then on, Andrus set out to prove the validity of Walters’ assertions. MUFON sent investigators Robert Reid and Gary Watson to “stakeout” Ed’s place (with the Walters’ permission). That way, when he saw the flying saucer, they could be on hand to verify and record it. But on two separate occasions, when Walters alerted them of the UFO’s presence, neither investigator could spot it. Nevertheless, Walters still produced photographs of the encounters.
On 25 January, Walters led investigator Charles Flannigan to a spot where he said he saw a UFO land. They eventually came to a circular spot of dead grass covered with some type of liquid. They took samples of the liquid for further testing.
Since the investigators couldn’t see Walters’ UFO with their own eyes, and because the previous examination of his photographs from Dr. Nathan were inconclusive, MUFON decided to give him a Nimslo 3D camera. The Polaroid camera Walters had already used made double exposures difficult, but not impossible. The Nimslo camera would make it nearly impossible for an amateur photographer to fake. Moreover, the camera was pre-loaded and sealed. Reid warned that if Walters broke the seal, it would severely diminish his credibility.
In addition to the new camera, Flannigan set up an appointment for Walters to take a polygraph test. Walters stood them up, claiming he’d forgotten about it. Ed then arranged for someone else to administer the polygraph. Sure enough, operator Havery McLaughlin gave Walters a clean bill of health:
Following two separate multiple chart specific issue examinations there were no specific physiological reactions of a deceptive nature noted to any of the reviewed test questions. General areas of questioning followed as: "Did you lie or falsify the information you have furnished me concerning the UFOs you have seen?" "Did you in any way falsify or lie about the photographs you have presented concerning these UFOs?" "Did you in any way falsify or lie about the humanoid beings that you saw or any other physical evidence that you have presented?" With the information that is present at this time, furnished by the examinee, no consistent deceptive responses are seen....Weeks went by with neither Ed nor Frances seeing anything resembling a UFO. They then thought to track one down by going to a local park in which others had seen UFOs. Now armed with a tamper-proof camera, they finally saw a cigar-shaped UFO on 26 February, and snapped away.
With the information that is available to this examiner at this time it is felt that Mr. Walters truly believes that the photographs and personal sightings he has described are true and factual to the best of his ability.
In a final effort to prove the validity of the Walters case, MUFON asked Dr. Bruce Maccabee to examine the photos. Dr. Maccabee, an optical physicist working for the United States Navy as a civilian, became convinced of the photographs’ validity. At the 1988 MUFON Symposium, he presented a paper validating that the photographs were not the result of a model, or trick photography, or double exposures. That meant they could only have been real.
In 1990, Walters and Dr. Maccabee co-wrote the book UFOs Are Real: Here’s the Proof.
MUFON, Dr. Maccabee, and perhaps many other ufologists relied on a number of evidentiary pieces to argue that Ed Walters had recorded a flying disc up close before being abducted on numerous occasions from 1987-1988. There were the photographs, first of all. Walters was, by no means, a professional photographer. So the Polaroid photographs, and those that he later took with a professional grade 35mm camera, could have been faked, but that would be difficult for an amateur like Walters. Then, there were the photographs taken by the sealed Nimslo 3D camera, which appear to be genuine, with no evidence of tampering or double-exposures. Then too many other people reported UFOs. Most of them didn’t know the Walters. There were also the polygraph tests. They seemed to corroborate the Walters’ truthfulness. Other things pointed towards their truthfulness as well. The Walters were pillars of the community. Ed’s wealth meant that he didn’t have a financial incentive to hoax (even though he secured a $200K advance for the writing of UFOs Are Real, and has since written other books). Moreover, if you have ever seen Mr. and Mrs. Walters in interview, they come across as sincere, long-suffering victims of UFO attacks and abductions.
After a little digging, however, a number of people representing the press, the police, debunkers, rival UFO organizations, and even a faction within MUFON didn’t find the evidence so compelling when held to scrutiny. What’s worse, they found evidence to refute just about everything in Walters’ story.
too many crying wolf. Makes it hard to separate any wheat from the masses of chaff.
ReplyDeleteReally fascinating Xdell-thanks so much for this!! agree with Mr Gramlich's comment --I always meant to ask you--and forgive me if I did and it slipped my memory--if you had ever heard of this author and his book Light Years?
ReplyDeleteLight Years wasnt the only book of his I have enjoyed and read several others. Link Gary Kinder
all the best to you my friend!!
I've been away for a few days and will have to catch up with your last few posts, X. Dell. I was overdue for a vacation. So I'm still around in case you were wondering about my lack of activity online lately.
ReplyDeleteread it! ... :)
ReplyDeletei really have no relevant pertinent comment at the moment though.
Charles, you've somewhat articulated where I'm going with this. I think this is a case of someone deliberately crying wolf, knowing well the effect.
ReplyDeleteDevin, I have not heard of Gary Kinder, but I'll check out your link. Thanks.
Ray, I hope you enjoyed your vacation. I would guess that you have some developed opinions on this particular subject. I look forward to hearing them.
Foam, I'm glad to see you around. I'm not here much because I'm working on a project that's consuming just about all my 'Net time. I'll straighten up and fly right anon.
X. Dell:
ReplyDeleteI'm somewhat familiar with Ed Walters; some time ago I read the book, The Gulf Breeze Sightings. I could comment but don't want to ruin any details you might bring up later.
I too agree with Charles...
ReplyDeleteI started to write a ton here but its better suited for an email so I am going to do that now. Hope all is good with you. If the mail gets bounced back (im not sure I have a current address lol) I will come post here again! =]] Have a great week! xo
ok i dont have it... the kefrisk acct is dead it seems from lack of use. I have been using the gmail acct if you still have that address drop me a note so I have your address.
ReplyDeleteI was just hoping to catch up a bit and see what you were up to lately. =] Hope its all good!
Ray, I'll still look forward to what both you and Devin have to say about it.
ReplyDeleteHelene, my address is the same: xdelll@gmail.com. Hope things are well with you.
Flying by again to say hi and thanks for visiting even though I'm hardly going anywhere at the mo
ReplyDelete